fixing-pr-comments

A workflow for handling unresolved comments on a GitHub pull request, which is a proposed code change waiting for review. It finds each open discussion, sorts it into an action, and handles the result.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to find open pull-request discussions, decide which require code changes, verify and commit those changes, reply to reviewers, close resolved discussions, and push the commits.
Why use it?
It prevents review comments from being missed or handled inconsistently. It separates changes that block merging from comments that only need an explanation or a decision.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/reviewstage/stage-cli/fixing-pr-comments
Any agent
npx skills add ReviewStage/stage-cli --skill fixing-pr-comments
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ReviewStage/stage-cli

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 27 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 946 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00027 $0.00946
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00473
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00189
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00095

Measured 2d ago against content hash 8425c8638c68, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

fixing-pr-comments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/fixing-pr-comments/SKILL.md · 103 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Fixing PR Comments

Fetch all unresolved PR threads, triage, fix blockers, resolve the rest.

Workflow

1. DETECT  → PR number/repo from current branch
2. FETCH   → Unresolved review threads (GraphQL)
3. TRIAGE  → Classify each: FIX / RESOLVE / CLARIFY
4. PRESENT → Show triage table, proceed immediately
5. FIX     → Implement → verify → commit → reply → resolve (one commit per fix)
6. PUSH    → Push all commits
7. RESPOND → Reply to RESOLVE (+ resolve) and CLARIFY threads

Detect & Fetch

gh pr view --json number,url

# GraphQL required — REST lacks isResolved
# Use --input - to avoid gh's -f flag mangling ! in non-null type annotations
gh api graphql --input - <<'GRAPHQL'
{
  "query": "query($owner:String!,$repo:String!,$pr:Int!){repository(owner:$owner,name:$repo){pullRequest(number:$pr){reviewThreads(first:100){nodes{id isResolved path line comments(first:10){nodes{id databaseId body author{login}}}}}}}}",
  "variables": {"owner": "OWNER", "repo": "REPO", "pr": NUM}
}
GRAPHQL

Filter to isResolved: false only.

Triage

Default to RESOLVE. Only FIX what genuinely blocks merge. Resolve everything else with reasoning. Don't gold-plate — ship it.

Category Criteria Action
FIX Bugs, security issues, correctness problems — blocks merge Implement + commit + resolve
RESOLVE Nits, style, "consider X", minor suggestions, pedantic bot feedback, already addressed Reply with reasoning + resolve
CLARIFY Ambiguous, needs context Ask in thread, leave open

Quality flag during triage: If a comment requests something that violates a principle in the Implementation Quality section of AGENTS.md, categorize it as RESOLVE and cite the specific principle it conflicts with.

Present triage table, then proceed immediately:

| # | File:Line | Summary | Category | Reasoning |

Fix Loop

For each FIX:

  1. Implement the change
  2. Apply forward — find the same pattern elsewhere in the codebase and fix those too
  3. Quality gate — evaluate the fix against every principle in the Implementation Quality section of AGENTS.md. If any principle is violated, revise before committing.
  4. Verify it compiles/passes
  5. Commit (one per fix)
  6. Reply + resolve:

Read the full file on GitHub · 103 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 103 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 8425c8638c68

Subscribe to this mod's changes

fixing-pr-comments is a skill published in the GitHub repository ReviewStage/stage-cli (267 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 946 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens