Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to RichardGeorgeDavis/Codex-Workspace. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RichardGeorgeDavis/Codex-Workspace/main/.agents/skills/quality-gate/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RichardGeorgeDavis/Codex-WorkspaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/richardgeorgedavis/codex-workspace/quality-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/richardgeorgedavis/codex-workspace/quality-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/richardgeorgedavis/codex-workspace/quality-gate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00242 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00121 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
quality-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Quality Gate
Use this skill when the task needs a visible definition of done instead of informal confidence.
Intent
Make completion criteria explicit before or during implementation so verification is cheaper and less subjective.
Recommended mode handling
fast: verify the critical path onlystandard: verify the normal user path plus obvious regressionsstrict: verify edge cases, regressions, and failure handling before treating the work as complete
Working rules
- State what must be true for the task to count as done.
- Prefer observable checks over vague confidence.
- Distinguish required verification from optional nice-to-have checks.
- If a check cannot be run, say so explicitly and state the residual risk.
Output shape
Use a compact structure such as:
- scope
- required checks
- checks completed
- checks skipped
- residual risks
Good fits
- release preparation
- refactors with regression risk
- security-sensitive changes
- migration work
- tasks where multiple contributors need the same definition of done
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 44 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A bdba76da8ef4
quality-gate is a skill published in the GitHub repository RichardGeorgeDavis/Codex-Workspace (2 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 242 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.
playwright-cli
Automates browser interactions for testing and validating your own web applications using playwright-cli. Use when you need terminal-first browser control for navigation, form filling, screenshots, tracing, bound browser sessions, debugging, or generating Playwright test code. Only use against applications you own or…