Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add RichardGeorgeDavis/Codex-Workspace --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RichardGeorgeDavis/Codex-WorkspaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/richardgeorgedavis/codex-workspace/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/richardgeorgedavis/codex-workspace/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/richardgeorgedavis/codex-workspace/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/richardgeorgedavis/codex-workspace/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/richardgeorgedavis/codex-workspace/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00216 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00108 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00043 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
typescript-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to typescript-review — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
TypeScript Review
Use this skill when a TypeScript change needs structured review rather than a generic pass.
Focus areas
- type safety versus runtime reality
- API and schema drift
- async error paths
- build and lint impact
- test coverage for behavior changes
Recommended mode handling
fast: review changed code paths and obvious type/runtime mismatchesstandard: review impacted call sites, validation, and testsstrict: review edge cases, migrations, contracts, and likely regression surfaces
Review prompts
Ask:
- can the runtime value violate the static type assumption?
- are errors surfaced, swallowed, or rethrown consistently?
- did a public contract change without matching validation or tests?
- does the change rely on unsafe casts, optional values, or implicit coercion?
Output shape
Prefer:
- findings first
- open questions second
- change summary last
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 40 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A bc82231a09e4
typescript-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository RichardGeorgeDavis/Codex-Workspace (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 216 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to typescript-review, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
no-bare-casts
Writing as in TypeScript or TSX production code, modifying a file that contains a bare as cast, silencing a type error with a cast, encountering as unknown as, or reviewing a cast site.
coding-standards
Universal coding standards, best practices, and patterns for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and Node.js development.
plankton-code-quality
Write-time code quality enforcement using Plankton — auto-formatting, linting, and Claude-powered fixes on every file edit via hooks.
typescript-style-guide
Apply, review, and explain the opinionated conventions in the TypeScript Style Guide. Use automatically only when TypeScript conventions are part of the requested task, including type modelling, discriminated unions, function APIs, variables and state, naming, source organization, React props, component APIs, state…
architecture-audit
Systematic architecture audit and refactoring methodology for Rust + TypeScript codebases. Use when performing refactoring, cleanup, unification, code review, dead code removal, module reorganization, or tech debt elimination. Ensures no naming confusion, semantic overloading, hidden defaults, duplicate logic, or…
stale-comments-audit
Audit and fix JavaScript, TypeScript, and Go comments that are verified as stale, orphaned, misleading, or redundant.