Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add RichardGeorgeDavis/Codex-Workspace --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RichardGeorgeDavis/Codex-WorkspaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/richardgeorgedavis/codex-workspace/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/richardgeorgedavis/codex-workspace/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/richardgeorgedavis/codex-workspace/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/richardgeorgedavis/codex-workspace/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/richardgeorgedavis/codex-workspace/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00216 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00086 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00043 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
typescript-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to typescript-review — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
TypeScript Review
Use this skill when a TypeScript change needs structured review rather than a generic pass.
Focus areas
- type safety versus runtime reality
- API and schema drift
- async error paths
- build and lint impact
- test coverage for behavior changes
Recommended mode handling
fast: review changed code paths and obvious type/runtime mismatchesstandard: review impacted call sites, validation, and testsstrict: review edge cases, migrations, contracts, and likely regression surfaces
Review prompts
Ask:
- can the runtime value violate the static type assumption?
- are errors surfaced, swallowed, or rethrown consistently?
- did a public contract change without matching validation or tests?
- does the change rely on unsafe casts, optional values, or implicit coercion?
Output shape
Prefer:
- findings first
- open questions second
- change summary last
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A bc82231a09e4
typescript-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository RichardGeorgeDavis/Codex-Workspace (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 216 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to typescript-review, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
typescript-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| typescript-reviewRichardGeorgeDavis/Codex-Workspace | Skill | 3 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code, Codex |
| no-bare-castsprisma/orm | Skill | 48k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 52 | Claude Code, Codex |
| coding-standardshashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins | Skill | 1.5k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 28 | Claude Code, Codex |
| splitting-oversized-modulesPostHog/posthog | Skill | 41k | yesterday | none | A | 197 | Claude Code, Codex |
| best-practicesFradSer/dotclaude | Skill | 596 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| plankton-code-qualityloulanyue/awesome-claude-notes | Skill | 271 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |
| architecture-auditorg2AI/ORG2 | Skill | 2.6k | 3d ago | AGPL-3.0 | A | 70 | Claude Code, Codex |