Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add richfrem/agent-plugins-skills --skill os-lab-scorergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/richfrem/agent-plugins-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/richfrem/agent-plugins-skills/os-lab-scorer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/richfrem/agent-plugins-skills/os-lab-scorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/richfrem/agent-plugins-skills/os-lab-scorer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/richfrem/agent-plugins-skills/os-lab-scorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/richfrem/agent-plugins-skills/os-lab-scorer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00230 | $0.01235 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00092 | $0.00494 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00046 | $0.00247 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
os-lab-scorer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Lab Scorer (os-lab-scorer)
One locked check for one change. It never loops: the loop belongs to os-lab-loop, which calls
this skill once per change. Two modes share the same gate: check (score a change someone
else proposed) and single pass (RED-GREEN-REFACTOR on one skill).
Contents
Critical constraints
- Locked evaluator: never modify
evaluate.py,eval_runner.pyorevals/evals.jsonto make a score pass. Only the targetSKILL.mdchanges. - Objective verification: never simulate routing or judge by impression. Every verdict comes from running
evaluate.py. - One variable per change: reject bulk rewrites; the gate cannot attribute a score change to several edits.
- Holdout gate: if base score rises but holdout score falls, force DISCARD (overfitting). A run with no holdout set is incomplete.
- F1 guard: never disable the
f1 >= baseline_f1check; it is the only defense against keyword stuffing.
Quick start
Baseline a target once, then score each change:
python scripts/evaluate.py --skill <path/to/target-skill> --baseline --desc "initial baseline"
python scripts/evaluate.py --skill <path/to/target-skill> --desc "what changed"
echo $? # 0 = KEEP, 1 = DISCARD (reverted), 2 = path error, 3 = tampered environment
Pass the skill folder, not a file. State lives in the target: evals/evals.json,
evals/results.tsv and its optimization program file.
Workflow
Mode 1: Check one change
- Confirm the proposal changes one variable and write it to the target
SKILL.md. - Run
evaluate.py; read the exit code and the new row inevals/results.tsv. - Apply the holdout gate (see overfitting-gate.md).
- DISCARD: confirm
SKILL.mdwas restored and report score, delta and F1. KEEP: commit the single change (keep: score=<s> f1=<f1> <desc>). - Return the verdict to the caller. Exit codes 2 and 3 are not verdicts; see troubleshooting.md.
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 91 lines · 230 tokens per session scan A c171f4677f8d
os-lab-scorer is a skill published in the GitHub repository richfrem/agent-plugins-skills (7 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 230 tokens to every session and 1,235 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-16.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa
Run scalable, isolated live QA for nac development. The top-level local orchestrator must parse n (default 4), dispatch one setup worker with this skill, copy its n assignment contracts verbatim into exactly n parallel test workers with this skill, then dispatch one aggregate worker with this skill using all test…
ap-independent-checker
Independently review the exact result and run its real checks in one context, using isolated resources and without changing the deliverable.
ap-execharness-resolver
Report the compatibility redirect to ap-worker; this retired role cannot perform new work.
ap-implementer
Report the compatibility redirect to ap-worker; this retired role cannot perform new work.
ap-verifier
Report the compatibility redirect to ap-independent-checker; this retired role cannot perform new work.
codew-release-qa-sweep
Use before claiming Codewhale release work is done: run the full gate sweep and list the manual QA targets.