Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ricneves-ai/flowgrammers-skills --skill adversarial-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ricneves-ai/flowgrammers-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ricneves-ai/flowgrammers-skills/adversarial-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ricneves-ai/flowgrammers-skills/adversarial-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ricneves-ai/flowgrammers-skills/adversarial-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ricneves-ai/flowgrammers-skills/adversarial-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ricneves-ai/flowgrammers-skills/adversarial-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00097 | $0.03297 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.01648 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00659 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00330 |
Grade A, and why
adversarial-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 249 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Revisor de Código Adversarial
Descrição
Skill de revisão de código adversarial que força mudanças genuínas de perspectiva por meio de três personas de revisores hostis (Sabotador, Novo Contratado, Auditor de Segurança). Cada persona DEVE encontrar pelo menos um problema — nenhum "LGTM" passa. Os resultados são classificados por severidade e promovidos quando capturados por múltiplas personas.
Funcionalidades
- Três personas adversariais — Sabotador (quebras em produção), Novo Contratado (manutenibilidade), Auditor de Segurança (baseado em OWASP)
- Resultados obrigatórios — Cada persona deve expor pelo menos um problema, eliminando revisões superficiais
- Promoção de severidade — Problemas capturados por 2+ personas são promovidos um nível de severidade
- Quebrador de armadilha de auto-revisão — Técnicas concretas para superar pontos cegos de modelo mental compartilhado
- Veredictos estruturados — BLOQUEAR / PREOCUPAÇÕES / LIMPO com orientação clara para merge
Uso
/adversarial-review # Revisar mudanças staged/unstaged
/adversarial-review --diff HEAD~3 # Revisar os últimos 3 commits
/adversarial-review --file src/auth.ts # Revisar um arquivo específico
Exemplos
Exemplo: Revisando um PR Antes do Merge
/adversarial-review --diff main...HEAD
Produz um relatório estruturado com resultados de todas as três personas, deduplicados e classificados por severidade, terminando com um veredicto BLOQUEAR/PREOCUPAÇÕES/LIMPO.
Problema que Esta Skill Resolve
Quando o Claude revisa código que escreveu (ou que acabou de ler), ele compartilha o mesmo modelo mental, as mesmas suposições e os mesmos pontos cegos que o autor. Isso produz revisões do tipo "Parece bom para mim" em código que um revisor humano novo sinalizaria imediatamente. Usuários relatam isso como uma das maiores frustrações no desenvolvimento assistido por IA.
Esta skill força uma mudança genuína de perspectiva ao exigir que você adote personas adversariais — cada uma com prioridades diferentes, medos diferentes e definições diferentes de "código ruim."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 249 lines · 97 tokens per session scan A 8c25c8f04027
adversarial-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository ricneves-ai/flowgrammers-skills (112 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 3,297 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's…
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's…
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.