Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rigortype/rigor --skill rigor-askgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rigortype/rigorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rigortype/rigor/rigor-ask)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rigortype/rigor/rigor-ask"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rigortype/rigor/rigor-ask/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rigortype/rigor/rigor-ask"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rigortype/rigor/rigor-ask.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.03052 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.01221 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00610 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00305 |
Grade A, and why
rigor-ask scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 198 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ask Rigor anything
Someone has a question about Rigor. It might be about a diagnostic, the type model, a flag, how Rigor stacks up against another type checker, whether Rigor can handle their framework, how to type a method — or just "what is this, and should I use it?" Whatever it is, answer from the source, not from memory.
Two things make that easy, and you have both offline:
- Rigor's own docs ship inside the gem.
rigor docsserves the full handbook and manual, always matching the user's installed version, no network. This is the authoritative copy: a rule's exact firing condition, a flag's spelling, a config default — all drift release to release, andrigor docsis the copy that shipped with this install, so an answer drawn from it cannot disagree with the binary they run. - Rigor can read the user's actual code. When the question is about
their program — "why is this flagged?", "what type does Rigor see
here?", "how well-typed is my project?" —
rigor check/annotate/type-of/triage/coverageanswer from what Rigor inferred. A concrete inferred type beats any abstract explanation.
This is the user's shortcut: they only ever need to remember three
skills — rigor-next-steps ("what should we do next?"),
rigor-ask ("answer this about Rigor"), and rigor-type-oracle
("before you write a type, ask Rigor"). They ask in plain language; you
turn it into the right lookup or analysis so they never have to remember
the command.
Prefer the live map over this skill's tables
The doc-page names and command flags below are a snapshot; Rigor's pages
and CLI move release to release, and a vendored copy of this skill (e.g.
added via npx skills) lags further still. Treat the tables as
orientation, then confirm against the installed Rigor, which is always
current:
rigor docs --list # the live doc map — what pages exist in THIS version
rigor --help # the live command + flag list
rigor skill --full rigor-ask # the current version of this skill itself
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 198 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 7037b80de3bb
rigor-ask is a skill published in the GitHub repository rigortype/rigor (107 stars, last pushed today), licensed MPL-2.0. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 3,052 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-26.
rigor-ask compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rigor-askrigortype/rigor | Skill | 107 | today | MPL-2.0 | A | 63 | Claude Code, Codex |
| hr-onboardingnexu-io/open-design | Skill | 106k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 62 | Claude Code, Codex |
| book-mirrorgarrytan/gbrain | Skill | 32k | today | MIT | A | 138 | Claude Code |
| exam-forecastanthropics/claude-for-legal | Skill | 9.9k | 3d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 73 | Claude Code |
| lean-formalizewanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep | Skill | 19k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |
| eli5companion-inc/feynman | Skill | 10k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code, Codex |
| deck-course-modulenexu-io/html-anything | Skill | 9.4k | 24d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 25 | Claude Code, Codex |