Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rigortype/rigor --skill rigor-unused-adjudicategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rigortype/rigorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rigortype/rigor/rigor-unused-adjudicate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rigortype/rigor/rigor-unused-adjudicate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rigortype/rigor/rigor-unused-adjudicate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rigortype/rigor/rigor-unused-adjudicate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rigortype/rigor/rigor-unused-adjudicate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.01006 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00402 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00201 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00101 |
Grade A, and why
rigor-unused-adjudicate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Adjudicating rigor unused
rigor unused answers which project classes and modules does no reachable
code name? — not what can I delete. Closing that gap is the work, and the
manual chapter has the method:
rigor docs 18-removing-dead-code
Read it before adjudicating anything. It carries the false-positive shapes with their measured frequencies, the pre-deletion checklist, and how to report the result. This skill exists for the part the chapter cannot do for you: work out what the report can and cannot see on this particular project, before you trust a single row.
Do that first, because every check below changes how the output should be read — and skipping one is how a live class ends up on a deletion list.
Establish the ground first
Run the report and answer these against the project in front of you.
Are framework roots actually supplied? When a plugin contributes roots, the
summary's roots: line grows a parenthetical: roots: N (M from plugins, K matched no declaration). The parenthetical is omitted entirely when no plugin
contributed — so on a framework application, a bare roots: N with no
(… from plugins …) note means nothing is naming your controllers, jobs or
policies, and most of the report is noise. Stop and fix the plugin
configuration — rigor docs 07-plugins — rather than adjudicating hundreds of
rows.
Does the project ship signatures? If signature_paths: is configured, also
run with it emptied and compare:
rigor unused # normal
rigor unused --config /tmp/no-sig.yml # a copy of your config with signature_paths: []
Adjudicate the union. On one application the signature-free run surfaced three genuinely dead classes that the default run never showed. Rows that appear only without signatures are still worth checking — signatures reference classes, and a reference the report counts is not always one a human would.
What do paths: actually cover? Only Ruby under those paths is analysed.
Views are the common gap: a helper called from app/views/**/*.erb has no Ruby
caller at all, and will land in the report looking unused. Before believing any
helper or presenter row, grep the view tree for it.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 96 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A ffb711e43a4a
rigor-unused-adjudicate is a skill published in the GitHub repository rigortype/rigor (107 stars, last pushed today), licensed MPL-2.0. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,006 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-26.
rigor-unused-adjudicate compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rigor-unused-adjudicaterigortype/rigor | Skill | 107 | today | MPL-2.0 | A | 67 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingopen-metadata/OpenMetadata | Skill | 16k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 37 | Claude Code |
| log-error-digestzebbern/claude-code-guide | Skill | 4.7k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 71 | Claude Code, Codex |
| cwv-optimizeradobe/skills | Skill | 319 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 112 | Claude Code |
| ci-fixersipyourdrink-ltd/bernstein | Skill | 1.2k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 15 | Claude Code, Codex |
| incident-response-incident-responsermyndharis/antigravity-skills | Skill | 1.9k | 23d ago | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| triaging-web-analytics-supportPostHog/posthog | Skill | 41k | today | none | A | 151 | Claude Code, Codex |