Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rikdc/ai-skills --skill commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rikdc/ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rikdc/ai-skills/commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rikdc/ai-skills/commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rikdc/ai-skills/commit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rikdc/ai-skills/commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rikdc/ai-skills/commit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.00766 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00306 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00153 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Commit - Conventional Commit Messages
Creates commits with short conventional commit messages. Runs pre-commit checks and suggests splitting when the staged changes cover more than one concern.
Usage
/git-workflow:commit [--no-verify] [--help]
Workflow
- Pre-commit checks (unless
--no-verify): runmake checksif available. - Git analysis: inspect staged files and
git diffto identify the change. - Commit: write the message, then commit.
If nothing is staged, stage all modified files. If the diff covers distinct concerns, propose atomic commits before committing.
Message Rules
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
[body — only when required]
- No emoji. Not in the subject, not in the body.
- Subject: imperative mood, lower case, no trailing period, under 60 characters.
scopeis optional; include it only when it disambiguates.- Default to a subject line alone. Most commits need nothing more.
- Add a body only for information the diff cannot show: why the change was made, a breaking change, or an issue reference. Cap it at two short sentences or three bullets.
- Never restate the diff, list touched files, summarise your process, or add closing commentary.
Types
feat: new featurefix: bug fix, security fix, warning fixdocs: documentationstyle: formattingrefactor: restructuring without behaviour changeperf: performancetest: testschore: tooling, dependencies, configurationci: CI/CD
Splitting Criteria
Propose separate commits when the staged changes mix concerns, mix types (feature + fix + docs), or are large enough that one message cannot describe them accurately.
Examples
Good:
feat(auth): add session refresh endpointfix(render): release texture handles on unmountdocs: document the scanner exit codesrefactor: collapse duplicate error wrapping
With a body, where the reason is not visible in the diff:
fix(scanner): match patterns case-insensitively
Uppercase AWS keys were slipping through, reported in #212.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 103 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 47e3b3239ab0
commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository rikdc/ai-skills (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MPL-2.0. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 766 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
branch-and-worktree-workflow
Isolates feature work in its own branch or worktree and integrates it cleanly when done. Use this when starting work that should not disturb the current workspace, when several efforts must proceed in parallel on one repository, or when implementation is finished and the change needs merging, rebasing, or splitting…
phx-pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
next-step
Change-aware next step advisor. Use when: user asks what to do next, workflow progression is unclear, session just started with dirty worktree. Not for: executing the suggested command (user decides), auto-loop decisions (hooks handle that). Output: findings-based suggestions or session summary with commit seed.
precommit
Pre-commit checks — lint:fix -> build -> test.
precommit-fast
Quick pre-commit checks — lint:fix -> test.
release
Bump a plugin's version, write a detailed changelog entry for the upgrade skill to consume, and commit+push. Takes a plugin slug argument identifying which plugin under plugins/ to release. Use this skill whenever the user says "release", "version bump", "cut a release", "changelog and push", or finishes a set of…