Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rjmurillo/ai-agents --skill pr-quality-analystgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rjmurillo/ai-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality-analyst/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality-analyst.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.01463 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00585 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00293 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00146 |
Grade A, and why
pr-quality-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 18d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- pr-quality-architect — 86% identical, 30 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Quality Gate: Analyst
Run the analyst axis of the quality gate against your working changes, before you push, using the canonical axis criteria.
Migrated from the pr-quality/analyst command under ADR-064, which makes skills the single user-invocable surface and renames the namespaced sub-command pr-quality/analyst to pr-quality-analyst. The command file is gone, so its path is named here in plain text rather than as a citation to something a reader could open.
Triggers
analyst review my changes, run the analyst gate, what does this change cost us, pr-quality analyst
Arguments
Base branch: $ARGUMENTS
If $ARGUMENTS names a branch, diff against it. Otherwise default to main.
Criteria
Apply the criteria from: @.github/prompts/pr-quality-gate-analyst.md
That file is the canonical axis definition and the one definition this skill reads. Do not paraphrase it from memory: read it, then judge the diff against what it says.
Process
- Run
git branch --show-currentto name the current branch. - Resolve the base branch from
$ARGUMENTS, defaulting tomain. Reject an empty value or one starting with-(Git parses a leading dash as an option, not a ref), then resolve it to a commit withBASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse --verify --quiet "<base_branch>^{commit}"). An unresolved or rejected ref is a hard stop: report it and do not fall back to an empty diff. Use$BASE_SHAin every git command below, not the branch name: the branch can move between this step and a later diff, and the SHA cannot. - Build the changed-file list from tracked changes
(
git diff "$BASE_SHA" --name-only) plus untracked files (git ls-files --others --exclude-standard); the local review scope is uncommitted changes, and a tracked-only diff misses a change set that is entirely new files. Read each untracked file's full content directly, since it carries no diff against the base. - Run
git diff "$BASE_SHA"to read the full diff of tracked changes. - Judge the diff against every criterion in the axis file. Findings are additive: a criterion that fails does not end the pass, because the author needs the whole list in one round rather than one finding per round.
- Emit the verdict block, then the JSON block.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 18d ago Changed b2acd3e2e6fd
- 22d ago Changed · +6 lines 5d0cc97be887
- 1mo ago Changed · +14 lines 217d637a0b84
- 1mo ago First seen · 102 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 74296c96fbc5
pr-quality-analyst is a skill published in the GitHub repository rjmurillo/ai-agents (48 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 1,463 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.
Other skills, from other repositories
install-gemini-code-review-action
Installs, configures, or upgrades Dazbo's PR code review & issue triage GitHub Action (gemini-review-action) in a target repository. Use when the user wants to set up, configure, or update automated AI code reviews, issue triaging, or Gemini model workflows for their GitHub repository.
review-deep
Review change vs spec, plan, code quality heuristics, and repo rules; append remediation phase if needed.
review-remote
Review open PR/MR and publish findings.
apply-review-feedback
Classify and apply accepted PR/MR review feedback.
azure-devops-automation
CI/CD pipelines, infrastructure as code, and deployment automation for Azure workloads.
architecture-audit
Comprehensive project consistency review across code, documentation, diagrams, and configuration.