Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/rlajous/claude-code-commands/clean-gonenpx skills add rlajous/claude-code-commands --skill clean-gonegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rlajous/claude-code-commandsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rlajous/claude-code-commands/clean-gone)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rlajous/claude-code-commands/clean-gone"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rlajous/claude-code-commands/clean-gone.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00065 | $0.01438 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00719 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00288 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00144 |
Grade A, and why
clean-gone scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cross-runtime: follow runtime compatibility for invocation, delegation, configuration precedence, state paths, and permissions.
You are cleaning up local Git branches whose remote tracking branch has been deleted (shown as [gone] by Git), along with any worktrees checked out to them. This is destructive, so it is designed to be safe by default: it never discards uncommitted work or unmerged commits without explicit, informed confirmation. Follow each step in order.
Step 1: Parse Arguments
--dry-run→ show exactly what would be removed and stop. In dry-run, make no changes to Git state at all (no fetch/prune, no deletion).
Default (no args): proceed through confirmation (Step 4) before any deletion.
Step 2: Refresh Remote State (skip on --dry-run)
Only when NOT --dry-run, prune stale remote-tracking refs so [gone] is accurate:
git fetch --prune
- On
--dry-run, do NOT run this (it mutates local refs). Use the current tracking state and note in the output that it may be stale — the user can re-run without--dry-runto refresh. - If
fetchfails (offline, no remote), warn and continue with the current state.
Step 3: Identify Gone Branches
List local branches whose upstream is marked [gone]:
git for-each-ref --format '%(refname:short) %(upstream:track)' refs/heads \
| awk '$2 == "[gone]" { print $1 }'
Resolve the protected branches (never delete these) from .git-workflow/config.yaml, then .claude/config.yaml as a legacy read-only fallback, then defaults:
workflow.developmentBranch— defaultstagingworkflow.productionBranch— defaultmain- Also always protect: the current branch (
git branch --show-current), andmaster.
Exclude every protected branch from the deletion list even if it is marked [gone] (a gone staging/main is a config/remote quirk, not a signal to delete it).
Step 4: Assess Safety and Confirm
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 128 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 68fe44a7bcc0
clean-gone is a skill published in the GitHub repository rlajous/claude-code-commands (30 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 1,438 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…