omh-research-department

omh-research-department is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from rlaope/oh-my-hermes. It costs 89 tokens per session (1,398 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for setting up recurring research operations with separate roles for finding sources, analysing them, and preparing briefings. It also tracks source collections, stored knowledge, and evidence status.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for daily competitor monitoring, market-change tracking, and other continuing research programmes.
Why use it?
It removes the need to design an ongoing research process and its supporting pieces by hand.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it for daily competitor monitoring, market-change tracking, and other continuing research programmes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/omh-research-department
About the project

oh-my-hermes is an operating layer for Hermes Agent that organizes requests into workflows for planning, research, creation, coding handoffs, operations, and project memory. Hermes users run these workflows through the desktop app, CLI, or messenger app, while the catalogue add-ons extend its native capabilities.

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 1,677 stars · on GitHub · rlaope.github.io

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill omh-research-department
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rlaope/oh-my-hermes

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for omh-research-department

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/omh-research-department/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/omh-research-department)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/omh-research-department"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/omh-research-department/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for omh-research-department

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/omh-research-department"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/omh-research-department.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 89 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,398 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00089 $0.01398
Opus 5 $0.00044 $0.00699
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00280
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00140

Measured 4d ago against content hash 67643a3c27f4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

omh-research-department scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/omh-research-department/SKILL.md · 126 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Research Department

This is a Hermes-native research-department workflow skill.

Why This Exists

research-department exists so Hermes users can start complex research-ops patterns without manually designing profiles, cron, knowledge storage, synthesis tooling, and delivery glue, while OMH keeps every runtime claim observed-only.

Do Not Use When

  • The user only needs a one-off current-source lookup; use research.
  • The user only needs a one-off business synthesis; use research-brief.
  • The request is pure scheduling with no source collection or synthesis; use automation-blueprint.
  • The user asks for coding implementation; prepare a selected executor/runtime handoff after the research plan is accepted.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: Set up a Scout, Analyst, and Briefer research flow for daily competitor and market changes.
  • Expected behavior: Prepare research_department_plan/v1 with Scout/Analyst/Briefer lanes, source inbox buckets, briefing status, knowledge-store and synthesis-tool readiness, and observed-only evidence requirements.
  • Why: The request is recurring, source-backed, and operational; a single research brief would miss the ongoing workflow/status boundary.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: research-department prove the synthesis tool queried the knowledge base and posted the Slack brief.
  • Expected behavior: Ask for observed synthesis-tool and gateway delivery evidence or mark those states as not_observed.
  • Why: The workflow pack can prepare the operating pattern, but it cannot prove external tool execution or delivery.

Completion Checklist

  • The research question, source boundaries, recency assumptions, and confidence level are named.
  • Observed sources, inference, synthesis, and unresolved retrieval gaps are separated.
  • Follow-up planning or handoff uses the research summary without calling it execution evidence.

Recovery Notes

  • If sources cannot be accessed, state the retrieval gap and use only observed local context.
  • If evidence is thin or one-sided, lower confidence and ask for a narrower source boundary.

Read the full file on GitHub · 126 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago Changed 67643a3c27f4
  2. 7d ago Changed d3eb45e762bf
  3. 9d ago First seen · 126 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A 34cc6390be14

Subscribe to this mod's changes

omh-research-department is a skill published in the GitHub repository rlaope/oh-my-hermes (1,677 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 1,398 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.