ulw-plan

ulw-plan is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from rlaope/oh-my-hermes. It costs 51 tokens per session (2,090 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow skill for researching a codebase or source material, comparing options, identifying risks, and preparing a reviewable implementation plan.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to gather facts, evaluate approaches, define what success means, and prepare a handoff for implementation.
Why use it?
It helps teams agree on requirements and acceptance criteria before coding begins, reducing planning based on assumptions.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it to gather facts, evaluate approaches, define what success means, and prepare a handoff for implementation.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/ulw-plan
About the project

oh-my-hermes is an operating layer for Hermes Agent that organizes requests into workflows for planning, research, creation, coding handoffs, operations, and project memory. Hermes users run these workflows through the desktop app, CLI, or messenger app, while the catalogue add-ons extend its native capabilities.

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 1,677 stars · on GitHub · rlaope.github.io

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill ulw-plan
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rlaope/oh-my-hermes

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ulw-plan

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/ulw-plan/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/ulw-plan)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/ulw-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/ulw-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ulw-plan

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/ulw-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/ulw-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 51 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,090 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00051 $0.02090
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.01045
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00418
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00209

Measured 4d ago against content hash ad7f130b32e8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ulw-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/ulw-plan/SKILL.md · 144 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Ralplan

This is a Hermes-native ralplan workflow skill.

Why This Exists

ralplan exists to make planning reviewable before execution: Hermes should gather codebase/source facts, compare options, expose risks, define acceptance criteria, and prepare a handoff without pretending implementation already happened.

Do Not Use When

  • The request is still too ambiguous to name requirements, non-goals, or acceptance criteria; use deep-interview first.
  • The user asks for one full research-plan-implementation-review-PR cycle; use ultrawork (its delivery_boundary capability) and keep ralplan as the planning stage.
  • The change is a small local refactor or cleanup with no architectural or regression risk; use ultrawork, or ai-slop-cleaner when observable behavior must stay identical.
  • The refactor's direction is already decided and what is missing is its execution shape - which files move in which phase, what verifies each phase, where each phase rolls back to; use refactor-plan.
  • One plan-blocking choice still needs behavior evidence rather than argument; run decision-prototype first and consume its decision receipt without transcript replay.
  • The user wants a pure source lookup, citation check, or paper explanation with no implementation plan.
  • The unresolved work is repository terminology alignment or a project-language decision frontier; use context before planning.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: $ralplan turn this risky refactor into a reviewable plan with acceptance criteria and verification commands.
  • Expected behavior: Produce repo/source facts, alternatives, risk review, acceptance criteria, exact verification commands, and handoff readiness without editing code.
  • Why: The request is clear enough to plan but risky enough to require consensus-style review before execution.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: $ralplan implement the refactor now and open the PR.
  • Expected behavior: Stop at the reviewed plan or route the full delivery cycle to ultrawork after plan acceptance.
  • Why: Ralplan is a planning gate, not implementation, review, CI, or PR evidence.

Read the full file on GitHub · 144 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago Changed · +1 lines ad7f130b32e8
  2. 9d ago First seen · 143 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 7521ff50aba0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ulw-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository rlaope/oh-my-hermes (1,677 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 2,090 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

story-long-analyze

A structured process for deeply analysing a long online novel, starting with its opening three chapters and continuing chapter by chapter.

uu201/character-arc · 175 tokens

story-review

A review process for finding problems in a novel’s structure, characters, wording, and world rules. It can use several reviewers or one reviewer when others are unavailable.

uu201/character-arc · 74 tokens

moxiangtongxiu-perspective

A Chinese-language creative-writing guide built around character-led stories, interwoven plotlines, memorable dialogue, ensemble casts, and emotional contrasts. It is presented as a perspective associated with the author Mo Xiang Tong Xiu.

momozi1996/awesome-ai-persona-skills · 136 tokens

tiancantudou-perspective

A creative-writing guide based on the storytelling patterns associated with Chinese web novelist Tiancan Tudou. It focuses on stories where an underestimated character grows stronger through challenges and moves into new settings.

momozi1996/awesome-ai-persona-skills · 158 tokens

tianya-gods-team

A decision-making system in which 20 fictional specialist viewpoints analyze one question in parallel before a coordinating AI combines them. It covers areas such as history, economics, relationships, technology, mysteries, and culture.

momozi1996/awesome-ai-persona-skills · 230 tokens

lijigang-skill

A Chinese-language approach to writing precise, highly structured prompts, sometimes using Lisp-like notation. It combines concise wording, philosophical questioning, and a process for defining roles, conditions, output formats, and revisions.

momozi1996/awesome-ai-persona-skills · 169 tokens