Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/rmarquesa/agentmemory-offline/recallnpx skills add rmarquesa/agentmemory-offline --skill recallgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rmarquesa/agentmemory-offlineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rmarquesa/agentmemory-offline/recall)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rmarquesa/agentmemory-offline/recall"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rmarquesa/agentmemory-offline/recall.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00061 | $0.00484 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00242 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
recall scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
The user wants to recall past context about: $ARGUMENTS
Quick start
memory_smart_search { "query": "jwt refresh token rotation", "limit": 10 }
Expected output:
2 results across 2 sessions.
[importance 8] decision · "Rotate refresh tokens on every use" (session 7f3a9c21)
[importance 5] code · "limit.ts counts per-IP" (session b21d004e)
Why
Only surface what the tool returned. Never fabricate an observation, a session id, or an importance score. If nothing comes back, say so.
Workflow
- Call
memory_smart_searchwith the user's text asqueryandlimit: 10. Passprojectwhen the user scopes to a specific repo. - Group results by session.
- For each observation show its type, title, and narrative.
- Lead with the high-signal observations (importance >= 7).
- If zero results, suggest 2-3 alternative search terms and stop. Do not guess.
Anti-patterns
WRONG: results are empty, so you write "We probably discussed token expiry last week" from assumption.
RIGHT: "No memories matched that query. Try refresh token, session expiry,
or auth rotation."
Checklist
- Every observation shown came from the tool response.
- Results grouped by session, high-importance first.
- Empty results trigger alternative-term suggestions, not invention.
- No session id or score was paraphrased or rounded.
See also
remember: the write side; recall retrieves what it stores.recap,handoff,session-history: session-scoped views of the same data.
Troubleshooting
See ../_shared/TROUBLESHOOTING.md if memory_smart_search is not available.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 61 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 718ab72876b5
recall is a skill published in the GitHub repository rmarquesa/agentmemory-offline (0 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 484 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
plur-memory
Persistent learning for AI agents. Open engram format. Your agent learns from corrections, remembers across sessions, and transfers knowledge across domains.
plur-session-end
Extract durable learnings at the end of a session. Saves corrections, preferences, and codebase patterns as engrams — nothing ephemeral, nothing sensitive.
plur-memory
Your memory stays on your machine. No cloud, no tracking, no API key. PLUR makes your OpenClaw remember — and shares that memory with every other tool you use.
engraphis-memory
Give the agent durable, scoped, explainable memory across sessions and repositories through the Engraphis MCP tools. Use when you learn a convention, decision, bug cause/fix, or user preference worth keeping; when prior context would help before you answer or act (to avoid re-asking or re-deriving); when asked "why is…
paxm-setup
Configure paxm for the Claude Code plugin.
paxm
Recall or remember durable project context with paxm.