error-debugging-multi-agent-review

error-debugging-multi-agent-review is a skill for Claude Code from rmyndharis/antigravity-skills. It costs 17 tokens per session (1,360 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide to coordinating multiple specialized agents to review software from different perspectives. It is intended for multi-agent code review orchestration, where separate AI workers contribute to one assessment.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for workflows that assign software-review tasks to multiple agents and combine their findings.
Why use it?
It helps organize broad reviews that a single reviewer may overlook. The input does not provide enough detail to describe its specific review checks.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it for workflows that assign software-review tasks to multiple agents and combine their findings.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rmyndharis/antigravity-skills/error-debugging-multi-agent-review
About the project

Antigravity Skill Vault is a collection of reusable Agent Skills for Google Antigravity, covering software development, operations, security, and business work. It is for people who want Antigravity agents to follow specialized expertise, personas, and structured workflows. The catalogue skills are entries from this collection.

rmyndharis/antigravity-skills · 1,496 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rmyndharis/antigravity-skills --skill error-debugging-multi-agent-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rmyndharis/antigravity-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for error-debugging-multi-agent-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rmyndharis/antigravity-skills/error-debugging-multi-agent-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rmyndharis/antigravity-skills/error-debugging-multi-agent-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rmyndharis/antigravity-skills/error-debugging-multi-agent-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rmyndharis/antigravity-skills/error-debugging-multi-agent-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 17 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,360 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00017 $0.01360
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.00680
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00272
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00136

Measured 4d ago against content hash c6f8811aeb4b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

error-debugging-multi-agent-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

skills/error-debugging-multi-agent-review/SKILL.md · 216 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 216 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Multi-Agent Code Review Orchestration Tool

Use this skill when

  • Working on multi-agent code review orchestration tool tasks or workflows
  • Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for multi-agent code review orchestration tool

Do not use this skill when

  • The task is unrelated to multi-agent code review orchestration tool
  • You need a different domain or tool outside this scope

Instructions

  • Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
  • Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
  • Provide actionable steps and verification.

Role: Expert Multi-Agent Review Orchestration Specialist

A sophisticated AI-powered code review system designed to provide comprehensive, multi-perspective analysis of software artifacts through intelligent agent coordination and specialized domain expertise.

Context and Purpose

The Multi-Agent Review Tool leverages a distributed, specialized agent network to perform holistic code assessments that transcend traditional single-perspective review approaches. By coordinating agents with distinct expertise, we generate a comprehensive evaluation that captures nuanced insights across multiple critical dimensions:

  • Depth: Specialized agents dive deep into specific domains
  • Breadth: Parallel processing enables comprehensive coverage
  • Intelligence: Context-aware routing and intelligent synthesis
  • Adaptability: Dynamic agent selection based on code characteristics

Tool Arguments and Configuration

Input Parameters

  • $ARGUMENTS: Target code/project for review
    • Supports: File paths, Git repositories, code snippets
    • Handles multiple input formats
    • Enables context extraction and agent routing

Agent Types

  1. Code Quality Reviewers
  2. Security Auditors
  3. Architecture Specialists
  4. Performance Analysts
  5. Compliance Validators
  6. Best Practices Experts

Multi-Agent Coordination Strategy

1. Agent Selection and Routing Logic

  • Dynamic Agent Matching:
    • Analyze input characteristics
    • Select most appropriate agent types
    • Configure specialized sub-agents dynamically
  • Expertise Routing:
    def route_agents(code_context):
        agents = []
        if is_web_application(code_context):
            agents.extend([
                "security-auditor",
                "web-architecture-reviewer"
            ])
        if is_performance_critical(code_context):
            agents.append("performance-analyst")
        return agents
    

Read the full file on GitHub · 216 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 216 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A c6f8811aeb4b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

error-debugging-multi-agent-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository rmyndharis/antigravity-skills (1,496 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,360 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

github

Manages all git operations (commit, push, branch management, PR creation) in a standardized, safe, and consistent way. Automatically runs the code-review skill before any commit. Enforces Conventional Commits standard. Handles the full lifecycle: branch → review → commit → push → PR.

omergocmen/vibe-coder-kit · 60 tokens

architecture-review

Before committing to an implementation plan, run this skill to stress-test the proposed architecture. Catches over-engineering, circular dependencies, missing failure modes, security gaps, and scalability cliffs — before any code is written. Acts as a "second eye" on the plan.

omergocmen/vibe-coder-kit · 57 tokens

code-review

Systematic code review skill covering both requesting a review (pre-commit checklist) and receiving and responding to review feedback. Checks code quality, security, test coverage, architectural alignment, and documentation before any code is committed.

omergocmen/vibe-coder-kit · 47 tokens

code-reviewer

Professional Code Reviewer Expert skill. Orchestrate technical collaboration, design reviews, sprint planning, and system diagnostics.

AtulPurohit/Antigravity-Awesome-Skills · 26 tokens

code-smell-detector

Professional Code Smell Detector Expert skill. Improve code delivery speed and developer workflows through automation and modern tooling.

AtulPurohit/Antigravity-Awesome-Skills · 27 tokens

pr-review-expert

Professional Pr Review Expert skill. Orchestrate technical collaboration, design reviews, sprint planning, and system diagnostics.

AtulPurohit/Antigravity-Awesome-Skills · 27 tokens