Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add RobinNorberg/oh-my-copilot --skill autopilotgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RobinNorberg/oh-my-copilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/autopilot)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/autopilot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/autopilot/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/autopilot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/autopilot.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.03423 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.01711 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00685 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00342 |
Grade A, and why
autopilot scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to autopilot — 30 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 267 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<Use_When>
- User wants end-to-end autonomous execution from an idea to working code
- User says "autopilot", "auto pilot", "autonomous", "build me", "create me", "make me", "full auto", "handle it all", or "I want a/an..."
- Task requires multiple phases: planning, coding, testing, and validation
- User wants hands-off execution and is willing to let the system run to completion </Use_When>
<Do_Not_Use_When>
- User wants to explore options or brainstorm -- use
planskill instead - User says "just explain", "draft only", or "what would you suggest" -- respond conversationally
- User wants a single focused code change -- use
ralphor delegate to an executor agent - User wants to review or critique an existing plan -- use
plan --review - Task is a quick fix or small bug -- use direct executor delegation </Do_Not_Use_When>
<Why_This_Exists> Most non-trivial software tasks require coordinated phases: understanding requirements, designing a solution, implementing in parallel, testing, and validating quality. Autopilot orchestrates all of these phases automatically so the user can describe what they want and receive working code without managing each step. </Why_This_Exists>
<Execution_Policy>
- Each phase must complete before the next begins
- Parallel execution is used within phases where possible (Phase 2 and Phase 4)
- QA cycles repeat up to 5 times; if the same error persists 3 times, stop and report the fundamental issue
- Validation requires approval from all reviewers; rejected items get fixed and re-validated
- Cancel with
/oh-my-copilot:cancelat any time; progress is preserved for resume </Execution_Policy>
<Workflow_Profiles>
Named stage profiles (v1)
Select a configured profile only with /autopilot --workflow <name> <task>. A profile is an autopilot-owned stage schedule, not a command, mode, plugin, filename, or separate state identity. Without --workflow, autopilot retains its legacy lifecycle and behavior.
Named workflow profiles require Linux with the flock utility in v1 because their transcript evidence boundary uses Linux no-follow file-descriptor traversal and their recoverable mutation lock uses kernel advisory locking. Unsupported environments reject explicit --workflow activation before state mutation; use legacy autopilot instead.
Profiles are configured in project or user JSONC as autopilot.workflows.<slug>. Every v1 profile has exactly version: 1 and stages; no other profile keys are accepted. The only admitted stage sequences are:
{
"autopilot": {
"workflows": {
"plan-build-qa": {
"version": 1,
"stages": ["ralplan", "execution", "qa"]
}
}
}
}
[ralplan, execution]
[ralplan, execution, ralph]
[ralplan, execution, qa]
[ralplan, execution, ralph, qa]
ralplan creates the plan consumed by execution; execution creates the implemented workspace required by ralph and qa. Thus omitted or reordered prerequisites, duplicate stages, and non-built-in stages are invalid. Profile names use ^[a-z][a-z0-9-]{0,62}$, are validated metadata only, and cannot collide with built-in stages, autopilot/mode names, or deprecated aliases.
User and project configuration sources are each validated before composition. Different names coexist; a project profile with the same name replaces the complete user profile rather than deep-merging it. Environment configuration cannot define or replace profiles.
On successful selection, autopilot atomically creates its existing session-scoped state with an immutable normalized descriptor and selected-only pipeline tracking. The descriptor contains the workflow name, profile version, canonical stages, and a deterministic SHA-256 profile hash; it excludes task text and mutable progress. Resume and Stop verify that hash and refuse a mismatch without reloading configuration or emitting a stage prompt. Cancel, resume, cleanup, state inspection, HUD, and Stop continuation remain owned by autopilot.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · +77 lines 7e9e302ff564
- 9d ago First seen · 190 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 54892b8530b8
autopilot is a skill published in the GitHub repository RobinNorberg/oh-my-copilot (5 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 3,423 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to autopilot, differing in 30 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
winui-design
Use when designing, reviewing, or fixing WinUI 3: sample and control discovery with winapp find-ui, layout planning, control choice, Fluent Design alignment, Light/Dark/High Contrast theming, typography, spacing, brushes, accessibility, and XAML data-binding design. Load before authoring new XAML, reviewing UI PRs…
winui-session-report
Analyze the current or a recent agent session (GitHub Copilot CLI or Claude Code) and generate a diagnostic report. Use only when the user explicitly asks for session feedback, agent debugging, or a review of what happened during a build session. Do not inspect session data automatically.
winui-packaging
MSIX packaging, code signing, and distribution for WinUI 3 apps — build for release, certificate generation (winapp cert generate), certificate trust, code signing (winapp sign), self-contained deployment, CI/CD with GitHub Actions, and Microsoft Store submission. Use when preparing for release, creating MSIX…
orchestrator-lanes
A file-based project-management playbook for a specific Claude Code development orchestrator. It organizes work into lanes, plans, dependency steps, validation phases, and shipping stages.
lane-memory
A file-based store for durable project facts that cannot be reliably inferred from source code or its module map.
yandex-webmaster
Loaded automatically when the description matches the active task. Read only the section you need, then follow the link to the relevant reference file.