Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add RobinNorberg/oh-my-copilot --skill discovergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RobinNorberg/oh-my-copilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/discover)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/discover"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/discover/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/discover"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/discover.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.02289 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01144 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00458 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00229 |
Grade A, and why
discover scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 246 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<Use_When>
- User wants to identify improvement opportunities:
/discover, "scan for improvements", "find issues" - Starting work on an unfamiliar codebase and wanting a quality baseline
- Preparing for a release and wanting a comprehensive quality check
- User wants a prioritized backlog of technical debt </Use_When>
<Do_Not_Use_When>
- User wants to review a specific PR or changeset — use
/deep-reviewinstead - User wants to fix a specific bug — delegate to debugger agent
- User wants to plan a feature — use
/planinstead </Do_Not_Use_When>
<Why_This_Exists> Codebases accumulate technical debt across many dimensions — security gaps, missing tests, performance hotspots, documentation gaps, architectural drift. No single agent can efficiently cover all dimensions. Discover parallelizes specialist scans and produces a unified, deduplicated, severity-prioritized backlog that teams can act on. </Why_This_Exists>
<Execution_Policy>
- All 6 scan agents MUST run in parallel (independent concerns)
- Each agent focuses exclusively on its category — no overlap
- Consolidation agent runs after all scans complete
- Default scope: encourage explicit scoping to a subdirectory. Full-codebase scan only if user explicitly requests it
- Output:
.omg/discover/backlog.md</Execution_Policy>
-
Launch 6 parallel scans: Fire all agents simultaneously
Scan 1 — Security:
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-copilot:security-reviewer", model="sonnet", name="discover-security", prompt=" DISCOVERY SCAN: Security Scan the codebase at [SCOPE] for security vulnerabilities and risks. Focus on: OWASP Top 10, hardcoded secrets, injection risks, auth gaps, input validation. For each finding, output: FINDING: - category: security - severity: CRITICAL|HIGH|MEDIUM|LOW - title: [brief title] - file: [file:line] - description: [what's wrong and why it matters] - suggestedAction: [specific fix recommendation] END_FINDING ")Scan 2 — Quality:
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-copilot:code-reviewer", model="sonnet", name="discover-quality", prompt=" DISCOVERY SCAN: Code Quality Scan the codebase at [SCOPE] for anti-patterns, complexity hotspots, and SOLID violations. Focus on: God objects, high cyclomatic complexity (>10), deep nesting (>4 levels), code duplication, magic numbers. For each finding, output: FINDING: - category: quality - severity: CRITICAL|HIGH|MEDIUM|LOW - title: [brief title] - file: [file:line] - description: [what's wrong and why it matters] - suggestedAction: [specific fix recommendation] END_FINDING ")Scan 3 — Tests:
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-copilot:test-engineer", model="sonnet", name="discover-tests", prompt=" DISCOVERY SCAN: Test Coverage Scan the codebase at [SCOPE] for test coverage gaps and test quality issues. Focus on: untested public APIs, missing edge case tests, flaky test patterns, missing integration tests. For each finding, output: FINDING: - category: tests - severity: CRITICAL|HIGH|MEDIUM|LOW - title: [brief title] - file: [file:line] - description: [what's missing and why it matters] - suggestedAction: [specific test to add] END_FINDING ")Scan 4 — Performance:
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-copilot:code-reviewer", model="sonnet", name="discover-perf", prompt=" DISCOVERY SCAN: Performance Scan the codebase at [SCOPE] for performance issues and optimization opportunities. Focus on: N+1 queries, O(n²) algorithms, unnecessary re-renders, missing caching, synchronous I/O in hot paths, memory leaks. For each finding, output: FINDING: - category: performance - severity: CRITICAL|HIGH|MEDIUM|LOW - title: [brief title] - file: [file:line] - description: [what's slow and why it matters] - suggestedAction: [specific optimization] END_FINDING ")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 246 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 5028b79cb2b2
discover is a skill published in the GitHub repository RobinNorberg/oh-my-copilot (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 2,289 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
winui-session-report
Analyze the current or a recent agent session (GitHub Copilot CLI or Claude Code) and generate a diagnostic report. Use only when the user explicitly asks for session feedback, agent debugging, or a review of what happened during a build session. Do not inspect session data automatically.
harness-doctor
Check whether this project's Agentsmith harness is installed correctly and healthy — fires on "is my harness set up right?", "harness doctor", "check my harness". Part of the Agentsmith harness; checks each selected agent's managed rules, settings, skills, hooks, verification, and leanness with a one-line fix for each…
verify-pr-logs
Checks GitHub Actions CI logs on a pull request, diagnoses failures, and guides the agent to implement fixes. Use when user mentions CI failing, check PR logs, fix pipeline, GitHub Actions errors, workflow failures, build broken, tests failing on PR, or debug CI. Focuses on PR-scoped CI analysis only.
gdb-cli
GDB debugging assistant for AI agents - analyze core dumps, debug live processes, investigate crashes and deadlocks with source code correlation.
kubestellar-console
Multi-cluster Kubernetes dashboard with AI-powered operations via MCP server and 10+ built-in agent skills.
lead-bug-hunt
Autonomous bug-elimination loop. Iteratively invokes /bug-hunt and /implement-batch until findings converge below an operator-specified severity floor. At termination, runs /review-test scoped to the run's new reproducing tests and fixes quality issues above the floor. Auto-approves /bug-hunt and /review-test ticket…