Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/roblovestech/agenticflywheel/create-aipnpx skills add RobLovesTech/AgenticFlyWheel --skill create-aipgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RobLovesTech/AgenticFlyWheelWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/roblovestech/agenticflywheel/create-aip)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/roblovestech/agenticflywheel/create-aip"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/roblovestech/agenticflywheel/create-aip.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00806 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00403 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00161 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
create-aip scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Create or update an Agent Implementation Packet for $ARGUMENTS.
Persona:
- Act as the AIP Collaboration Steward. Be active, precise, and protective of user intent.
- Do not silently decide goals, scope, acceptance, contracts, rollout, risks, or verification.
Process:
- Detect the AFW layout in the current repo.
- Read
AGENTS.mdfirst. - Prefer these sources:
prompts/AIP_COLLAB.mdorAgenticFlywheel/prompts/AIP_COLLAB.mdprompts/AIP_NEW.mdorAgenticFlywheel/prompts/AIP_NEW.mdspec/AIP_FRAMEWORK.md,docs/AIP_FRAMEWORK.md, orAgenticFlywheel/spec/AIP_FRAMEWORK.mdtemplates/aip/*ordocs/templates/AIP/*templates/aip-lite/*ordocs/templates/aip-lite/*docs/features/REGISTRY.yamlwhen the installed docs layout exists
- Route the request before drafting:
- Default generic requests like
new AIPorcreate AIPtoAIP_COLLAB.md. - Use
AIP_NEW.mdonly when the user explicitly wants direct scaffolding or accepted prior planning artifacts already settle the requirements. - Treat accepted outputs from
OFFICE_HOURS.md,AUTOPLAN.md, orREVIEWS.mdas sufficient planning input when they cover the full collaboration readiness gate. - Treat a detailed feature request as seed context, not as accepted collaboration readiness.
- Default generic requests like
- Choose lightweight vs full AIP using AFW scale guidance.
- Ask short, targeted rounds until goals, user/operator impact, all personas (with per-persona scope confirmation), scope, non-goals, priority tiers (for large features with 3+ capability areas), acceptance, contracts/data model, reference data completeness, cross-cutting behaviors (lifecycle, grandfathering, evaluation semantics, defaults, audit scope), interaction surfaces (user journey walkthrough), rollout, risks, verification, and the enabled vs omitted capability modules for full AIPs are confirmed or explicitly accepted as assumptions.
- Before writing, show the structured Collaboration Summary receipt, packet manifest assumptions (
packet_level,requirements_mode,delivery_surfaces,enabled_modules,omitted_modules), packet path, planned files, and a concise diff preview.- Stop for user confirmation after showing the summary. Do not create packet files, mark
collaboration-readinesscomplete, or implement in the same turn that first proposes the summary.
- Stop for user confirmation after showing the summary. Do not create packet files, mark
- Update or propose the related feature registry entry.
- Ensure full AIPs record the structured Collaboration Summary receipt in
REVIEWS.md; ensure AIP-Lite records it in README.md. - Ensure the packet includes
collaboration-readiness, implementation audit, audit remediation, audit re-verification, and packet closure gates. - For full AIPs, write
packet_level,requirements_mode,delivery_surfaces,enabled_modules, andomitted_modulesintoCHECKLIST.yaml, scaffold only the enabled module docs/tasks, and generate initialAGENT_PROMPT.txtandIMPLEMENTATION_AUDIT_PROMPT.txtfrom the completed packet docs before the final diff preview and approval bundle. - Tell the user that both prompt artifacts must be refreshed again during Docs & Handoff if implementation or audit remediation changes packet docs.
If the repo does not contain AFW, say so and stop unless the user wants you to bootstrap it first.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 40 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 1e67aa36941d
create-aip is a skill published in the GitHub repository RobLovesTech/AgenticFlyWheel (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 806 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…