What the reviewer found
A Linux forensics/incident-response playbook: it copies /etc/shadow, .bash_history, etc. from a mounted forensic evidence image (/mnt/evidence) into a local case folder (/cases/...), never touching a live system or sending data outside. The 'rm -rf /', 'iptables -F', 'chmod 777' items are just a list of suspicious strings the script greps for in shell history, not commands it runs, and the '.wget-hsts' hit is a browser artifact filename, not a network call.
dual-use— a security tool that can be misusedexample-or-fixture— an example or test fixture
What was read
The file as it ships in RobotFlow-Labs/skills-repo:
skills/analyzing-linux-system-artifacts/SKILL.md
What the static scan said
The scan flagged 4things. The reviewer kept 0 and dismissed 4 as false.
PE2Asks for root — false positivePE3Reaches for credential files — false positiveRMRecursive force delete — false positiveNETMakes network calls — false positive
How this review was made
Sonnet 5 read the files above on 7 September 2026 and answered three questions: is it dangerous to whoever installs it, is each scanner finding real, and what should the installer know. The verdict is bound to the file's hash; when the file changes, it is scanned afresh and reviewed again. A script that changes while the definition does not is not re-reviewed — that is a known gap. How the scan and the review work.