Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/rockarhymellc/claude-code-skills/spec-driven-devnpx skills add RockaRhymeLLC/claude-code-skills --skill spec-driven-devgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RockaRhymeLLC/claude-code-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rockarhymellc/claude-code-skills/spec-driven-dev)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rockarhymellc/claude-code-skills/spec-driven-dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rockarhymellc/claude-code-skills/spec-driven-dev.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.01651 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00826 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00330 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00165 |
Grade A, and why
spec-driven-dev scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 241 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spec-Driven Development
A structured workflow that takes features from idea to implementation through four phases: Specify → Plan → Review → Build.
When to Activate
- User wants to build a new feature or significant change
- User says
/spec-devor "let's build this properly" - User wants a structured approach to development
- A task is complex enough to benefit from upfront planning
Why This Workflow
Most AI coding goes wrong in the same way: jumping straight to code without understanding what to build, then burning context fixing design mistakes that planning would have caught.
This workflow prevents that by:
- Specifying what to build before writing any code
- Planning the implementation as testable stories
- Reviewing the plan with a fresh perspective (catches 80% of design issues)
- Building test-first so you know when you're done
Instructions
Phase 1: Specify (/spec-dev spec)
Create a clear specification document.
Gather requirements:
- What problem does this solve?
- Who uses it and how?
- What are the inputs, outputs, and edge cases?
- What are the constraints (performance, compatibility, security)?
- What does "done" look like?
Write the spec:
Create specs/{feature-name}.md:
# Feature: {Name}
## Problem
[What problem does this solve and why does it matter?]
## Solution
[High-level description of the approach]
## Requirements
### Functional
- [ ] [Specific, testable requirement]
- [ ] [Another requirement]
### Non-Functional
- [ ] [Performance target, if any]
- [ ] [Security constraints, if any]
## User Stories
- As a [role], I want [action] so that [benefit]
## Edge Cases
- [What happens when X?]
- [What about empty/null/concurrent inputs?]
## Out of Scope
- [Explicitly list what this does NOT include]
## Open Questions
- [Anything that needs clarification before building]
Output: Confirm the spec with the user. Resolve any open questions before proceeding.
Phase 2: Plan (/spec-dev plan)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 241 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 5a705ff22140
spec-driven-dev is a skill published in the GitHub repository RockaRhymeLLC/claude-code-skills (1 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 1,651 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
firebase-development-add-feature
This skill should be used when adding features to existing Firebase projects. Triggers on "add function", "create endpoint", "new tool", "add api", "new collection", "implement", "build feature". Guides TDD workflow with test-first development, security rules, and emulator verification.
agent-evaluation
Use when testing skills, commands, or agents for quality. Use after creating new skills, before deploying agents, or when debugging inconsistent agent behavior. Triggers on "evaluate", "test quality", "is this skill working", or QA of AI workflows.
tdd
Apply when adding new behavior or fixing a bug. Red-green-refactor cycle, test-first discipline, when TDD doesn't pay.
test-driven-developer
Write bulletproof code using Test-Driven Development (TDD) with proper unit tests, integration tests, mocking, and test architecture. Use when implementing features test-first or improving test coverage.
test-first-bugs
Enforces a test-driven bug-fixing workflow. Use when a user reports a bug, failing code, an error, or asks to fix something.
lsp-refactoring
Intelligent code refactoring using IDE-level tools (rename, find-references, go-to-definition), AST-aware pattern matching, and TDD verification. Use for safe, large-scale refactoring with precision.