Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rockyflux/yq-workflow --skill delightgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rockyflux/yq-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rockyflux/yq-workflow/delight)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rockyflux/yq-workflow/delight"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rockyflux/yq-workflow/delight/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rockyflux/yq-workflow/delight"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rockyflux/yq-workflow/delight.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.02185 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01092 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00437 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00218 |
Grade A, and why
delight scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to delight — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 304 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Identify opportunities to add moments of joy, personality, and unexpected polish that transform functional interfaces into delightful experiences.
MANDATORY PREPARATION
Invoke /frontend-design — it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run /teach-impeccable first. Additionally gather: what's appropriate for the domain (playful vs professional vs quirky vs elegant).
Assess Delight Opportunities
Identify where delight would enhance (not distract from) the experience:
-
Find natural delight moments:
- Success states: Completed actions (save, send, publish)
- Empty states: First-time experiences, onboarding
- Loading states: Waiting periods that could be entertaining
- Achievements: Milestones, streaks, completions
- Interactions: Hover states, clicks, drags
- Errors: Softening frustrating moments
- Easter eggs: Hidden discoveries for curious users
-
Understand the context:
- What's the brand personality? (Playful? Professional? Quirky? Elegant?)
- Who's the audience? (Tech-savvy? Creative? Corporate?)
- What's the emotional context? (Accomplishment? Exploration? Frustration?)
- What's appropriate? (Banking app ≠ gaming app)
-
Define delight strategy:
- Subtle sophistication: Refined micro-interactions (luxury brands)
- Playful personality: Whimsical illustrations and copy (consumer apps)
- Helpful surprises: Anticipating needs before users ask (productivity tools)
- Sensory richness: Satisfying sounds, smooth animations (creative tools)
If any of these are unclear from the codebase, Ask the user using AskUserQuestion.
CRITICAL: Delight should enhance usability, never obscure it. If users notice the delight more than accomplishing their goal, you've gone too far.
Delight Principles
Follow these guidelines:
Delight Amplifies, Never Blocks
- Delight moments should be quick (< 1 second)
- Never delay core functionality for delight
- Make delight skippable or subtle
- Respect user's time and task focus
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 304 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 460db76a6fbf
delight is a skill published in the GitHub repository rockyflux/yq-workflow (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 2,185 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to delight, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
chakra-ui-builder
Build responsive, accessible UI components and layouts using Chakra UI v3, install or configure Chakra UI in new and existing projects, and design scalable themes using tokens, semantic tokens, recipes, and slot recipes. Use this skill whenever a user asks to build, create, or generate any UI component, page, form…
visual-ralph
Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ralph with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.
frontend-visual-qa
Audits already-rendered web, landing-page, HTML deck/slide, browser tool/game, dashboard/admin, design-system, and desktop UIs using real-browser or native-app journeys, inspected screenshots, DOM geometry, responsive or projection viewports, and a bundled Playwright sweep. Use after UI implementation to find…
prototype-web
A clickable, high-fidelity web product prototype with navigation, a hero section, feature cards, steps, social proof, and optional pricing. It is designed to resemble a finished landing page while remaining a prototype.
animation-principles
Apply animation principles — easing, staging, follow-through — to one specific UI motion. Use when tuning how an animation feels. For product-wide duration and easing tokens use motion-system (design-systems); for a full interaction spec use micro-interaction-spec.
refactoring-ui
Audit and fix visual hierarchy, spacing, color, and depth in web UIs. Use when the user mentions "my UI looks off" (or amateur/unprofessional), "fix the design", "Tailwind styling", "color palette", "visual hierarchy", "design system", "spacing scale", or "component styling". Also trigger when building consistent…