Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add roedyrustam/vibes-plug --skill rea-analysis-optimizationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/roedyrustam/vibes-plugWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/roedyrustam/vibes-plug/rea-analysis-optimization)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/roedyrustam/vibes-plug/rea-analysis-optimization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/roedyrustam/vibes-plug/rea-analysis-optimization/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/roedyrustam/vibes-plug/rea-analysis-optimization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/roedyrustam/vibes-plug/rea-analysis-optimization.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.02440 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00976 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00488 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00244 |
Grade A, and why
rea-analysis-optimization scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to rea-analysis-optimization — 144 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 258 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
REA analysis optimization
Find a concrete source of unnecessary work, change it at its owner, and verify equivalent completed investigations. A useful outcome can also be a measured decision to leave an implementation alone.
Follow the checkout's performance priorities, tool design, and testing guide. This skill supplies an optimization workflow, not additional permission to execute targets, publish, or merge. Use the current contracts, provider prerequisites, and user authorization.
Read the Kuna case study when selecting a reuse strategy or interpreting a benchmark. Its pinned observations illustrate tradeoffs; they are not current-provider guarantees or universal speedups.
Pin the question and the correctness oracle
Describe the analyst's completed task, including the facts and relationships needed to answer it, requested detail, source access, and meaningful unknowns. Choose a representative real artifact and a small or empty case. Record the baseline revision, target digest, engine identity, options, host, and entrypoint. Use a separate checkout for changes without disturbing other work.
Establish an oracle independent of the changed implementation: source-built fixture expectations, independently mapped file bytes, or a native producer paired with checks of its interpretation. Comparing two wrappers around the same faulty decoder does not establish correctness. Preserve address widths, same-address alternatives, unresolved endpoints, coverage, and source linkage. An empty result proves absence only within the actually examined scope.
Locate the earliest unnecessary work
Trace one public CLI or MCP task through shared application code to its producer. Measure relevant phases: admission and identity checks, native analysis, decoding, lookup, projection, serialization, Evidence retention, and cleanup. Include catalog discovery and extra calls when they affect the completed task.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 258 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 5382cfc22b89
rea-analysis-optimization is a skill published in the GitHub repository roedyrustam/vibes-plug (113 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 2,440 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to rea-analysis-optimization, differing in 144 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
doubt-driven-development
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high…
performance-optimization
Optimizes application performance across frontend, backend, queries, and databases. Use when performance requirements exist, when you suspect performance regressions, when Core Web Vitals or load times need improvement, when N+1 query patterns need fixing, or when profiling reveals bottlenecks.
code-review
Reviews code for bugs, security issues, and best practices.
mantis-critic
Assesses the production viability of findings, filtering out debug-only features and assertion traps. Use when findings have been validated and you need to confirm they are triggerable in production release builds (with assertions disabled). Don't use for writing reproduction scripts or patches.
diagnosing-bugs
A structured process for diagnosing difficult software bugs and performance slowdowns. It starts by creating a repeatable pass-or-fail check, such as a failing test, HTTP request, command, or browser script.
mantis-patch
Generates minimal security fixes using transactional isolation (shadow directories or file backups), applies patches, and verifies them. Use when security findings are successfully reproduced and need patches applied and verified. Don't use for initial vulnerability research or reproduction payload generation.