Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill board-resolution-draftergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/board-resolution-drafter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/board-resolution-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/board-resolution-drafter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/board-resolution-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/board-resolution-drafter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.00891 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00050 | $0.00445 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00178 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
board-resolution-drafter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Board Resolution Drafter
I am using the Board Resolution Drafter skill from Rohas Legal AI: board and shareholder resolutions in correct form. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.
Purpose
Create an approval instrument that authorises the intended action at the right corporate level, records necessary conditions and conflicts, and gives named people workable implementation authority without silently expanding the decision.
Required inputs
Obtain:
- the entity's exact name, type, jurisdiction, registration details, and constitutional documents;
- the action to be approved, its commercial terms, supporting documents, and effective date;
- the proposed approving body and whether approval occurs at a meeting, by circulation, or by written consent;
- directors, shareholders or members, attendance, voting rights, quorum, conflicts, and abstentions;
- reserved matters, delegated authorities, financing covenants, investor rights, and third-party consent requirements; and
- filing, notarisation, certification, registry, exchange, lender, bank, or closing requirements.
Treat the entity, jurisdiction, action, approval body, approval method, and material terms as blocking. Use explicit placeholders rather than inventing names, amounts, dates, authority, or voting outcomes.
Method
- Build an approval map before drafting. Identify every approval potentially required under statute, constitution, shareholders' agreement, delegation policy, contract, listing rule, financing document, or regulator condition.
- Verify the current law and governance documents governing notice, agenda, quorum, voting, interested participation, circulation, written consent, and shareholder class rights. State unresolved conflicts between sources.
- Distinguish prerequisite findings from the decision itself. Include recitals only where they establish authority, disclose an interest, identify a document, or record a condition the approving body actually considered.
- Draft each operative resolution as a separate decision. Identify the transaction or document precisely, approval status, permitted changes, signatory, implementation authority, filing authority, and limits on delegation.
- Address conflicts and voting accurately. Name the declared interest and abstention only if supplied; do not imply participation or non-participation from silence.
- Sequence conditional approvals. State whether effectiveness depends on shareholder, lender, regulatory, counterparty, funding, valuation, or other approval and prohibit premature implementation where necessary.
- Attach or identify approved documents by title, date and version. Avoid approving a document that cannot be distinguished from later drafts.
- Create the post-approval action trail: execution, filing, notices, registers, certificates, disclosures, funds flow, closing deliverables, and custody of the signed resolution.
- Add certification or extract language only in the form required by the recipient and governing regime. Keep certification of a true extract distinct from proof that the underlying meeting was valid.
- Run consistency checks across entity names, defined terms, figures, dates, documents, approval thresholds, signatories, and action owners.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 56 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A 5acb208ace2e
board-resolution-drafter is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (88 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 891 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…