Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill comparative-analystgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/comparative-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/comparative-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/comparative-analyst/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/comparative-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/comparative-analyst.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00164 | $0.01088 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00082 | $0.00544 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00218 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
comparative-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Comparative Analyst
I am using the Comparative Analyst skill from Rohas Legal AI: compares the position across jurisdictions or statutes. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.
What this does
Compares how a specific legal question is treated across a specific, user-named set of jurisdictions or statutes. Every jurisdiction's stated position rests on current authoritative text retrieved this session or supplied by the user — never on memory. Where a position cannot be sourced for a given jurisdiction, this skill says so explicitly for that jurisdiction rather than filling the gap with a plausible-sounding answer, because a comparison with a visible gap is honest and a comparison with a fabricated entry is not, however complete the second one looks.
Before you start
The precise question being compared, and the exact list of jurisdictions or statutes to compare. Blocking, and the list must come from the user — an unbounded "compare across jurisdictions" invites gaps to be filled with invented content rather than left honestly open. Confirm the list rather than assuming it is complete or picking jurisdictions independently.
Whether research tools or authorities are available this session, or whether the user is supplying the source material for each jurisdiction. This determines the entire mode of operation. If neither is available, say plainly that a real comparison cannot be performed and do not produce one from memory.
Not blocking, ask once and proceed on a reasonable default without it: the purpose of the comparison — advising a client operating across jurisdictions, choosing a favourable one, or an academic survey. Shapes framing, not sourcing discipline.
Method
1. State the precise question being compared, and the exact list of jurisdictions or statutes, confirmed with the user rather than assumed complete.
2. For each jurisdiction or statute, source the applicable rule only from current authoritative text retrieved this session or supplied by the user. Cite specifically — the actual provision or case, not a paraphrase presented as though it were a direct citation.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 65 lines · 164 tokens per session scan A f32786662bcc
comparative-analyst is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (88 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 164 tokens to every session and 1,088 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…