Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill constitutional-rights-analystgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/constitutional-rights-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/constitutional-rights-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/constitutional-rights-analyst/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/constitutional-rights-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/constitutional-rights-analyst.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00122 | $0.00518 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00049 | $0.00207 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00104 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
constitutional-rights-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Constitutional Rights Analyst
I am using the Constitutional Rights Analyst skill from Rohas Legal AI: whether State action infringes constitutional rights. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.
What this does
Tests a law, rule, policy or action against the constitutional rights it may engage, using the justification framework of the governing constitution. It identifies the strongest rights arguments and the State's likely justification.
Before you start
The constitution and its framework. From Jurisdiction Counsel: the rights, who they bind, the restriction clauses and the courts' tests.
The measure: its text, purpose, date and the authority that made it, and how it affects the client.
Method
1. Rights engaged: list each right and why it is engaged on the facts.
2. State action: whether the respondent is bound by the rights provision.
3. Interference: how the measure restricts the right.
4. Justification: apply the governing test, such as a permitted ground of restriction, legitimate aim, rational connection, necessity, and proportionality or balancing. State the test as sourced or flagged for verification.
5. Equality and arbitrariness where the measure classifies or treats people differently.
6. Remedies: striking down, reading down, declarations, and interim relief.
7. Strength of each argument, with the State's best answer.
Output
1. Header. Measure, client, constitution, date.
2. Rights analysis table. Right | Interference | Justification | Strength.
3. State's likely defence.
4. Remedies and route.
5. Points requiring verification.
Do not
Do not state constitutional tests or leading cases from memory without flagging them. Do not treat a right as absolute where the constitution permits restrictions.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 51 lines · 122 tokens per session scan A 17a0bd0bed21
constitutional-rights-analyst is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (183 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 122 tokens to every session and 518 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-10.
Other skills, from other repositories
korean-law
A legal research connection to South Korea's official law information service. It can retrieve statutes, court decisions, administrative rules, local ordinances, treaties, and legal interpretations, then check cited provisions against the source.
engagement-terms-billing-guidelines
Outside counsel guidelines (OCGs) — drafting, review, gap analysis, and targeted updates for in-house legal teams. Build new OCGs calibrated to maturity level (light, standard, comprehensive), review existing OCGs against 15-component best practice framework, add or update specific sections (AI policy, AFA terms, D&I…
founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian
A drafting-and-review copilot for a founders' / co-founders' agreement — the terms fixing equity, vesting, IP, roles, control, deadlock, and departure between cofounders. Jurisdiction-agnostic, anchored on the Delaware C-corp default. Two modes: DRAFT (intake → equity & vesting → clauses → blocker triage →…
matter-allocation-instruction
Firm-matter matching, matter instruction drafting, firm onboarding checklist, and instruction audit for in-house legal ops teams. Match a new matter to the right panel firm by practice area, jurisdiction, complexity, and cost tier. Produce a structured matter instruction with scope, timeline, budget, staffing, and…
matter-intake-scoping-scott-margetts
Matter scoping across the full pre-execution arc — organise client data into a structured brief, capture the agreed baseline, or reconstruct scope mid-flight. Use when making sense of client information before a proposal, scoping a new matter, running a kickoff, defining scope, mapping stakeholders, or inheriting a…
ai-governance-reviewer-carl-ditzler
Use this skill when the user wants an AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk review of an internal AI use case, an AI product feature, an LLM workflow, or a third-party AI vendor. The skill asks intake and clarifying questions first when facts or evidence are missing, identifies…