Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill divorce-grounds-assessorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/divorce-grounds-assessor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/divorce-grounds-assessor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/divorce-grounds-assessor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/divorce-grounds-assessor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/divorce-grounds-assessor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00152 | $0.00896 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00061 | $0.00358 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00179 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
divorce-grounds-assessor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Divorce Grounds Assessor
I am using the Divorce Grounds Assessor skill from Rohas Legal AI: eligibility, grounds and route for divorce and other matrimonial relief. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.
What this does
Works out which matrimonial relief is available and which route fits: mutual-consent divorce, contested divorce on one or more grounds, judicial separation, restitution of conjugal rights, or a declaration of nullity. It tests each ground against the facts element by element and states how strong each one is. It does not draft the petition or the settlement.
Before you start
Governing law. Blocking. Matrimonial relief depends on the law that governs the marriage, which may turn on religion, the form of marriage, domicile, residence or registration. Ask the relevant Jurisdiction Counsel, or the user, which law governs. Do not assume one statute applies because of a party's name or location.
The facts. Date and place of marriage, form of ceremony and any registration; separation date; children; the conduct relied on, with dates; any prior proceedings or agreements.
Not blocking, ask once: whether the other spouse agrees to a divorce and its terms. This decides between the mutual-consent and contested branches.
Method
1. Confirm the governing law and the court with jurisdiction, as supplied by Jurisdiction Counsel. Note any residence or separation period that must be met before filing.
2. Check mutual consent first. If both spouses agree, identify the statutory conditions (for example a period of separation, a waiting or cooling-off period, and agreement on ancillary terms) and flag each period as needing verification.
3. For a contested route, list every ground the governing law offers and test each against the facts: element, facts supporting it, facts against it, evidence available, and a rating of strong, arguable or weak.
4. Consider alternatives to divorce where the client's objective or the facts point to them: judicial separation, restitution of conjugal rights, or nullity where the marriage may be void or voidable.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 59 lines · 152 tokens per session scan A 6fc45c64ce09
divorce-grounds-assessor is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (183 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 152 tokens to every session and 896 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-10.
Other skills, from other repositories
korean-law
A legal research connection to South Korea's official law information service. It can retrieve statutes, court decisions, administrative rules, local ordinances, treaties, and legal interpretations, then check cited provisions against the source.
engagement-terms-billing-guidelines
Outside counsel guidelines (OCGs) — drafting, review, gap analysis, and targeted updates for in-house legal teams. Build new OCGs calibrated to maturity level (light, standard, comprehensive), review existing OCGs against 15-component best practice framework, add or update specific sections (AI policy, AFA terms, D&I…
founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian
A drafting-and-review copilot for a founders' / co-founders' agreement — the terms fixing equity, vesting, IP, roles, control, deadlock, and departure between cofounders. Jurisdiction-agnostic, anchored on the Delaware C-corp default. Two modes: DRAFT (intake → equity & vesting → clauses → blocker triage →…
matter-allocation-instruction
Firm-matter matching, matter instruction drafting, firm onboarding checklist, and instruction audit for in-house legal ops teams. Match a new matter to the right panel firm by practice area, jurisdiction, complexity, and cost tier. Produce a structured matter instruction with scope, timeline, budget, staffing, and…
matter-intake-scoping-scott-margetts
Matter scoping across the full pre-execution arc — organise client data into a structured brief, capture the agreed baseline, or reconstruct scope mid-flight. Use when making sense of client information before a proposal, scoping a new matter, running a kickoff, defining scope, mapping stakeholders, or inheriting a…
ai-governance-reviewer-carl-ditzler
Use this skill when the user wants an AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk review of an internal AI use case, an AI product feature, an LLM workflow, or a third-party AI vendor. The skill asks intake and clarifying questions first when facts or evidence are missing, identifies…