Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill encumbrance-analystgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/encumbrance-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/encumbrance-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/encumbrance-analyst/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/encumbrance-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/encumbrance-analyst.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00165 | $0.01249 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00082 | $0.00624 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00250 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
encumbrance-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Encumbrance Analyst
I am using the Encumbrance Analyst skill from Rohas Legal AI: reads encumbrance records for charges, gaps and risk (India). Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.
What this does
Reads an encumbrance certificate — the Indian land record document showing registered transactions and charges against a property over a stated period — and extracts every entry, flags any charge that appears still subsisting, checks the chain of title the transaction entries imply for internal consistency, and states plainly what the certificate cannot show. An encumbrance certificate is only as complete as the underlying registration record; it does not catch off-register risk, and treating a clean-looking certificate as proof of clean title is the single most common way this document gets over-relied on.
Before you start
The encumbrance certificate itself. Blocking — there is nothing to analyse without the actual document or its text.
The period the certificate needs to cover for this transaction, and whether the supplied certificate actually covers it. Ask; do not assume a standard search period is sufficient. What period is actually needed depends on the applicable due diligence standard for this transaction, which should be confirmed rather than assumed.
Not blocking, ask once and proceed on what is available: whether other title documents — sale deeds, mutation records — are available to cross-check against the certificate's entries. Cross-checking strengthens the analysis but is not required to extract and flag what the certificate itself shows.
Method
1. Read the whole certificate once, extracting every entry chronologically — transaction type, parties, date, and any charge or encumbrance noted.
2. Check the period covered against what is actually needed for this transaction. Flag it if the certificate does not cover a sufficient period; do not assert what period is "sufficient" as a universal rule — note that it depends on the applicable due diligence standard, and that standard should be confirmed, not assumed.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 69 lines · 165 tokens per session scan A 9e443e9f5f9c
encumbrance-analyst is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (88 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 165 tokens to every session and 1,249 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…