Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill legal-explainergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/legal-explainer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/legal-explainer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/legal-explainer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/legal-explainer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/legal-explainer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00127 | $0.01308 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00063 | $0.00654 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00262 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
legal-explainer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 203 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Legal Explainer
I am using the Legal Explainer skill from Rohas Legal AI: explains a law, clause, judgment, or legal concept in clear plain language, adapted to the reader's level. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.
Purpose
Turn complex legal material into an accurate, understandable explanation that the intended reader can use.
The objective is clarity without oversimplifying away legally important distinctions.
This skill can explain:
- statutes, rules and regulations;
- legal concepts and doctrines;
- judgments and orders;
- contractual clauses;
- rights and obligations;
- legal procedures;
- regulatory requirements;
- legal terminology;
- a lawyer's analysis or position;
- the practical effect of legal documents.
Determine the explanation needed
Identify from the request, where possible:
- the topic or material to explain;
- jurisdiction, if legally relevant;
- who the explanation is for;
- the reader's existing level of legal knowledge;
- whether the user wants a short explanation or a deeper one;
- whether practical examples would help.
Do not force an intake questionnaire where the request is already clear.
If the user provides legal text, work from the supplied text first.
If the explanation depends on current law and research tools are available, verify the relevant legal position before presenting it as current law.
Explanation levels
Adapt automatically unless the user specifies a level.
Simple
Use for clients, non-lawyers and quick explanations.
Prefer:
- ordinary words;
- short sentences;
- concrete examples;
- minimal legal terminology.
Where a legal term is necessary, define it immediately.
Practitioner
Use for lawyers or legally informed users.
Preserve:
- legal terminology;
- doctrinal distinctions;
- procedural consequences;
- material exceptions and qualifications.
Still avoid unnecessary jargon.
Deep explanation
Use when the user wants to understand how the rule works rather than merely what it says.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 203 lines · 127 tokens per session scan A f7d9e5320a48
legal-explainer is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (88 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 127 tokens to every session and 1,308 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
policy-qa
Triage loop for inbound HR policy questions. Classifies each new question from the HR inbox as answerable from the documented Notion policy library or as needing HR's judgment, drafts a grounded Gmail reply for the former, and escalates the latter — anything ambiguous, legal, personal, or compensation-related — to…
patsnap-ip-innovation-courses
Patsnap IP & Innovation Courses MCP for AI agents. A one-stop learning entry for courses, course details, and training materials on IP and innovation. It helps teams build a structured understanding of patents, search, analysis, and business use while lowering the learning barrier for new users. It is useful for…
grad-public-choice
Apply public choice theory to analyze political decision-making as rational self-interested behavior. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate government policy failures, rent-seeking costs, voting outcomes, or bureaucratic incentives, especially when the assumption of benevolent government is questionable.
creative-commons-explainer
Explains a specific Creative Commons licence in plain language, telling a media professional exactly what they can and cannot do with the licensed content — including attribution requirements, commercial use rules, and derivative work restrictions.
common-law-contract-formation-consideration
Anwalt oder Mandant will Vertragsschluss-Grundlagen des Common Law verstehen: offer acceptance consideration deed promissory estoppel UCC. Anwendungsfall Transaktionsvertrag oder NDA mit UK/US-Gegenpartei. Prüfraster Consideration-Prüfung Deed-Anforderungen Estoppel-Risiko UCC-Varianten. Output Erklärung…
common-law-simulation-negotiation
Anwalt oder Mandant will UK/US-Vertragsverhandlung oder Mandantengespraech simulieren und False-Friends-Lernkurve absolvieren. Prüfraster Verhandlungs-Simulation Issue-List-Erstellung Mandanten-Erklärung. Output Simulations-Szenario Verhandlungs-Script Lern-Feedback. Abgrenzung zu common-law-quality-gate (Qualitaet)…