privilege-log-builder

privilege-log-builder is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills. It costs 67 tokens per session (708 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for creating and auditing logs of documents withheld from disclosure because they may be protected by legal privilege or another recognised protection.

In plain words
What is it for?
Preparing privilege logs for litigation, arbitration, investigations, and regulatory productions, including document families, redactions, waiver concerns, and challenges.
Why use it?
It helps record enough facts for the opposing side or tribunal to assess each claim without exposing the protected communication itself.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: shipped in a Claude Code plugin, but also agents/openai.yaml present.

Part of the rohas-legal-ai plugin — 149 skills shipped together

Good fit Preparing privilege logs for litigation, arbitration, investigations, and regulatory productions, including document families, redactions, waiver concerns, and challenges.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/privilege-log-builder
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill privilege-log-builder
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install rohas-legal-ai, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 149 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for privilege-log-builder

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/privilege-log-builder/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/privilege-log-builder)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/privilege-log-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/privilege-log-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for privilege-log-builder

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/privilege-log-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/privilege-log-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 67 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 708 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00067 $0.00708
Opus 5 $0.00034 $0.00354
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00142
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00071

Measured 9d ago against content hash 4b23ad2e0226, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

privilege-log-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/rohas-legal-ai/skills/privilege-log-builder/SKILL.md · 69 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Privilege Log Builder

I am using the Privilege Log Builder skill from Rohas Legal AI: supportable privilege entries, family reconciliation, waiver flags and challenges. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

Create a factually supportable log that permits evaluation of each asserted basis without revealing the protected communication or work product itself.

Intake

Obtain the governing jurisdiction and forum, procedural rules and orders, parties and client structure, relevant legal advisers and roles, applicable privilege or protection categories, document population, review decisions, family relationships, production and redaction data, confidentiality arrangements, clawback terms, challenge procedure, deadlines, and any categorical-log agreement.

Treat the governing law and required log fields as blocking for a final log. A draft may proceed with conspicuous placeholders and verification flags.

Method

  1. Identify every potentially applicable protection and its required elements. Distinguish legal-advice privilege, litigation or work-product protection, without-prejudice material, joint or common-interest arrangements, regulatory protections, and confidentiality; do not collapse them into "privileged."
  2. Verify the actors, their capacities, client relationship, purpose, recipients, confidentiality, legal context, and document date from evidence rather than names, domains, titles, or copied lawyers alone.
  3. Assign stable document IDs and preserve family, thread, duplicate, near- duplicate, attachment, version, redaction, and production relationships.
  4. Draft neutral descriptions that explain the general subject and protected purpose without revealing advice, strategy, mental impressions, or substance.
  5. Record the precise asserted basis, supporting facts, withholding or redaction status, confidentiality basis, and reviewer or counsel approval. Separate mixed- purpose material and non-privileged attachments where required.
  6. Test waiver, broad distribution, third-party presence, forwarding, dominant or primary purpose, client identity, advice capacity, in-house counsel role, litigation anticipation, crime-fraud or equivalent exceptions, and governing- law uncertainty. Flag; do not decide unsupported facts.
  7. Apply categorical, metadata-minimal, or exception treatments only where an order, agreement, or applicable rule supports them.
  8. Reconcile the log to withheld documents, redacted productions, slip sheets, numbering, families, and production totals. Identify orphans and inconsistent decisions.
  9. Prepare challenge responses by linking each disputed entry to its evidence and legal elements, while preserving protected content.

Read the full file on GitHub · 69 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 69 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 4b23ad2e0226

Subscribe to this mod's changes

privilege-log-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (88 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 708 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

specification-writing

A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 49 tokens

regulatory-research-fallback

Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.

HKUDS/OpenSpace · 20 tokens

x-scorecard

OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.

x-cmd/x-cmd · 57 tokens

gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb

Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.

Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht · 69 tokens

memstack-business-gdpr

Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…

cwinvestments/memstack · 121 tokens

nda-review

Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…

LegalQuants/lq-ai · 79 tokens