procedural-order-drafter

procedural-order-drafter is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills. It costs 102 tokens per session (843 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for turning an arbitration tribunal's directions, party submissions, rules, and hearing arrangements into a clear procedural order and timetable.

In plain words
What is it for?
Drafting tribunal orders covering case-management deadlines, document production, hearings, confidentiality, cybersecurity, and distribution.
Why use it?
It reduces uncertainty about what each participant must do, which documents are required, and when deadlines or hearings occur.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: shipped in a Claude Code plugin, but also agents/openai.yaml present.

Part of the rohas-legal-ai plugin — 149 skills shipped together

Good fit Drafting tribunal orders covering case-management deadlines, document production, hearings, confidentiality, cybersecurity, and distribution.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/procedural-order-drafter
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill procedural-order-drafter
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install rohas-legal-ai, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 149 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for procedural-order-drafter

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/procedural-order-drafter/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/procedural-order-drafter)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/procedural-order-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/procedural-order-drafter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for procedural-order-drafter

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/procedural-order-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/procedural-order-drafter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 102 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 843 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00102 $0.00843
Opus 5 $0.00051 $0.00421
Sonnet 5 $0.00020 $0.00169
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00084

Measured 9d ago against content hash f14b0881e37c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

procedural-order-drafter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/rohas-legal-ai/skills/procedural-order-drafter/SKILL.md · 56 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Procedural Order Drafter

I am using the Procedural Order Drafter skill from Rohas Legal AI: procedural orders and timetables for a tribunal. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

Purpose

Convert the procedural framework, tribunal decisions, and party positions into a clear, internally consistent order that all participants can follow without guessing what is required or when.

Required inputs

Obtain:

  • the arbitration agreement, seat, institution, applicable rules, and tribunal constitution;
  • terms of reference or equivalent foundational document, if any;
  • tribunal directions and party submissions on procedure;
  • agreed and disputed items from the case-management conference;
  • the procedural calendar, time zones, holidays, and hearing format;
  • any confidentiality, data, cybersecurity, or document-production protocol; and
  • the intended order number, date, signatories, and distribution list.

Treat the tribunal's actual ruling and the distinction between agreement and dispute as blocking. Insert a clearly labelled placeholder where the tribunal has not decided an issue; do not decide it while drafting.

Method

  1. Identify the source of procedural authority and any mandatory requirements. Verify the current official rules and seat law when the order states a legal power or consequence.
  2. Create a decision ledger with three categories: Agreed by the Parties, Directed by the Tribunal, and Reserved or Unresolved. Use that ledger to prevent a party proposal from becoming an order accidentally.
  3. Establish communication rules: authorised recipients, filing platform, copying protocol, form of request, business hours, time zone, deemed receipt, and prohibition on unilateral communication.
  4. Build a dependency-aware calendar. Sequence pleadings, document production, fact evidence, expert evidence, pre-hearing steps, hearing, post-hearing submissions, and costs. Check that each response date follows the material it answers and that dates match weekdays and stated time zones.
  5. Define filing mechanics: formats, page limits if directed, numbering, bundles, translations, electronic signatures, authorities, metadata, and correction of errors.
  6. State evidentiary procedure: burden remains a merits question unless ruled; address witness statements, experts, document requests, objections, privilege logs, hearing attendance, examination order, and tribunal questions only to the extent directed.
  7. Address hearing logistics, interpretation, transcription, recording, confidentiality, data handling, public access where relevant, and accessibility needs.
  8. State consequences of non-compliance only where the tribunal has authority and intends them. Preserve procedural fairness, opportunity to be heard, proportionality, and liberty to apply.
  9. Run a consistency check across names, defined terms, order numbers, cross-references, dates, time zones, and annexed timetable.

Read the full file on GitHub · 56 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 56 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A f14b0881e37c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

procedural-order-drafter is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (88 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 102 tokens to every session and 843 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

specification-writing

A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 49 tokens

regulatory-research-fallback

Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.

HKUDS/OpenSpace · 20 tokens

x-scorecard

OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.

x-cmd/x-cmd · 57 tokens

gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb

Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.

Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht · 69 tokens

memstack-business-gdpr

Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…

cwinvestments/memstack · 121 tokens

nda-review

Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…

LegalQuants/lq-ai · 79 tokens