Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill quashing-petition-draftergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/quashing-petition-drafter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/quashing-petition-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/quashing-petition-drafter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/quashing-petition-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/quashing-petition-drafter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00795 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00398 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00159 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
quashing-petition-drafter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 52 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Quashing Petition Drafter
I am using the Quashing Petition Drafter skill from Rohas Legal AI: petitions to quash proceedings (India). Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.
Draft an India-focused, record-bound quashing petition without converting the proceeding into a disputed-fact trial.
Required inputs
- FIR, complaint, charge sheet or police report and all challenged orders
- Offence date, registration date, procedural stage and current case status
- Invoked provisions, alleged acts and special statutes
- Court, territorial facts, parties and petitioner status
- Prior petitions, appeals, stays, settlements and connected proceedings
- Desired final and interim relief
Ask for missing operative documents. Do not plead from a summary when the underlying record is reasonably obtainable.
Method
- Select the legal route. Determine whether section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 through the applicable savings, or a constitutional or statutory route governs. Use offence dates, commencement, pending proceedings and savings provisions; do not assume the newest enactment applies.
- Check maintainability. Verify the proper High Court, standing, alternative remedies, prior litigation, delay, procedural requirements and the effect of any special statute. Confirm current Supreme Court and controlling High Court authority from primary sources.
- Apply a face-value element test. Map each alleged offence element to the allegations taken at their highest. Identify a missing legal ingredient precisely. Do not ask the court to weigh competing evidence, decide credibility or conduct a mini-trial.
- Test independent legal bars. Examine sanction, limitation, jurisdiction, statutory immunity, duplication, settlement or compounding, and other express bars. State the source and factual predicate for each.
- Assess abuse of process. Explain why the pleaded record, not labels alone, supports or defeats the ground. A commercial, contractual, matrimonial or civil dimension does not by itself eliminate a criminal offence.
- Handle settlement carefully. Verify voluntariness, signatures and scope; distinguish compoundable and non-compoundable offences; address seriousness, victim impact, societal interest and special-statute restrictions.
- Build the pleading record. Prepare parties, jurisdiction, concise facts, a dated chronology, grounds linked to record paragraphs, disclosure of prior proceedings, annexure references and a truthful verification or affidavit.
- Calibrate relief. Draft the quashing prayer and only necessary consequential relief. For interim protection, identify urgency, prejudice, balance, cooperation and the exact proceedings sought to be stayed.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 52 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 3e3bee6920d0
quashing-petition-drafter is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (88 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 795 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…