Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill resolution-plan-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/resolution-plan-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/resolution-plan-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/resolution-plan-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/resolution-plan-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/resolution-plan-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00733 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00367 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
resolution-plan-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Resolution Plan Reviewer
I am using the Resolution Plan Reviewer skill from Rohas Legal AI: resolution plans for compliance and commercial effect (India). Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.
Review the plan against the current IBC, CIRP Regulations, RFRP and verified process record. Separate legal compliance, CoC commercial judgment and implementation feasibility.
Required inputs
- Plan, addenda, undertakings, implementation and monitoring documents
- EOI, RFRP, evaluation matrix and process memoranda
- Resolution applicant group, beneficial owners and section 29A materials
- Claims, CoC composition, voting records and related-party analysis
- Insolvency process costs, liquidation value, fair value and valuation reports
- Security, guarantees, avoidance matters, litigation and regulatory exposures
- Financial model, funding proof, approvals and conditions precedent
- Prior plan versions, clarifications and current process deadline
Method
- Freeze the legal version. Verify the IBC including 2026 amendments, current CIRP Regulations and circulars, RFRP terms and controlling authority effective at plan submission and approval.
- Test applicant eligibility. Check section 29A, connected persons, beneficial ownership, affidavits, disclosures, competition concerns and required regulatory or governmental eligibility.
- Test mandatory contents. Map each current section 30(2) and regulation requirement to plan clauses and evidence, including costs, creditor treatment, management, implementation, supervision and compliance with law.
- Model distributions. Reconcile admitted claims, classes, security, priority, time value, contingent claims and payment dates. Test operational and dissenting financial creditor floors under current law and compare liquidation outcomes.
- Test feasibility and viability. Stress-test sources and uses, committed funding, working capital, assumptions, debt service, asset sales, tax, licences and business dependencies.
- Test legal effect. Review treatment of guarantees, security, contracts, employees, government claims, litigation, avoidance recoveries, licences, extinguishment requests and third-party rights.
- Test process compliance. Check plan receipt, modifications, equal information, evaluation, confidentiality, CoC deliberation, voting threshold and record, performance security and NCLT filing.
- Test implementation. Build conditions, approvals, long-stop dates, monitoring committee, control transfer, payment waterfall, default remedies, reporting and fallback provisions.
- Compare plans. Apply the disclosed evaluation matrix consistently and show legal, value, timing and execution differences without replacing CoC commercial judgment.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 46 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 97d81686c025
resolution-plan-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (88 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 733 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
expense-review-policy
Review invoices and contracts against accounts-payable policy before human approval.
kyc-doc-parse
Parse an investor or client onboarding packet into structured KYC fields — identity, ownership, control, source of funds, and document inventory. Use as the first step of KYC screening; output feeds the rules engine.
audit-support
Support SOX 404 compliance with control testing methodology, sample selection, and documentation standards. Use when generating testing workpapers, selecting audit samples, classifying control deficiencies, or preparing for internal or external audits.
fiscaliste
Fiscaliste IA pour la fiscalité personnelle des particuliers français : optimisation et déclaration de l'impôt sur le revenu, IFI, revenus du capital, revenus fonciers, equity salarial, crypto-actifs et PER. Couvre le calcul de l'IR (barème, quotient familial, décote, PAS, CEHR, revenus exceptionnels), la déclaration…
regulatory-analysis
Analyzes documents and processes against FINRA, SEC, Federal Reserve, and CFPB regulatory frameworks. Identifies compliance gaps, classifies findings by severity, and recommends remediation. Use when performing compliance audits, regulatory reviews, gap analyses, or verifying policy adherence to financial regulations.
subcontractor-payment-tracker
Track subcontractor payments, lien waivers, and compliance. Manage payment schedules and documentation.