Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add RohiRIK/OpenLtm --skill commandpathsafetygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RohiRIK/OpenLtmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohirik/openltm/commandpathsafety)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohirik/openltm/commandpathsafety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohirik/openltm/commandpathsafety/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohirik/openltm/commandpathsafety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohirik/openltm/commandpathsafety.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00273 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00109 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00055 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
command-path-safety scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Command Path Safety
Treat commands and paths as structured, validated inputs.
Workflow Routing
| Workflow | Trigger | File |
|---|---|---|
| HardenCommandExecution | "command injection", "shell safety", "exec hardening", "safe subprocess" | Workflows/HardenCommandExecution.md |
| EnforcePathBoundaries | "path traversal", "zip slip", "installer safety", "path boundaries" | Workflows/EnforcePathBoundaries.md |
SkillSearch
- Command injection guidance:
SkillSearch('command path safety command injection patterns')→ loadsCommandInjectionPatterns.md - Path and installer guidance:
SkillSearch('command path safety path traversal installer safety')→ loadsPathTraversalAndInstallerSafety.md
Use This Skill To
- Replace shell interpolation with validated structured execution.
- Enforce path roots for writes, extraction, and installer operations.
- Review archive and installer behavior for traversal and boundary escapes.
Not This Skill
- Not for exploit scanning, malware analysis, or final security verdicts.
- Hand off to @aegis for deep audits, exploitability assessment, or repo-wide review.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A b85805d58d94
command-path-safety is a skill published in the GitHub repository RohiRIK/OpenLtm (28 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 273 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
mem0-cli
Mem0 CLI -- the command-line interface for mem0 memory operations. TRIGGER when: user mentions "mem0 cli", "mem0 command line", "@mem0/cli", "mem0-cli", "pip install mem0-cli", "npm install -g @mem0/cli", or is running mem0 commands in a terminal/shell (mem0 add, mem0 search, mem0 list, mem0 get, mem0 init, mem0…
mem0-vercel-ai-sdk
Mem0 provider for Vercel AI SDK (@mem0/vercel-ai-provider). TRIGGER when: user mentions "vercel ai sdk", "@mem0/vercel-ai-provider", "createMem0", "retrieveMemories", "addMemories", "getMemories", "searchMemories", "mem0 vercel", "AI SDK provider", "AI SDK memory", or is using generateText/streamText with mem0. Also…
mem0-tour
Browses all stored memories grouped by category with full content display. Use when reviewing all project memories, exploring stored knowledge, onboarding to a project, or getting an overview of captured decisions, conventions, and learnings.
mem0-forget
Deletes memories by search query or memory ID with confirmation before removal. Use when removing outdated decisions, incorrect memories, sensitive data, or cleaning up after experiments. Also handles undo of recent additions.
mem0-remember
Stores a memory verbatim from user input with appropriate type classification and metadata. Use when the user says remember this, save this, store this, note that, or explicitly asks to record a decision, preference, convention, or learning.
mem0-search
Searches memories and displays compact one-liner results, or looks up a specific memory by ID. Use for quick memory lookups, checking if a decision was recorded, resolving [mem0:id] citations, or browsing memories without full category detail.