Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/rohitg00/agentmemory/recallnpx skills add rohitg00/agentmemory --skill recallgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohitg00/agentmemoryWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00061 | $0.00548 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00274 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
recall scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- recall — 88% identical, 3 lines differ
What it actually says
The user wants to recall past context about: $ARGUMENTS
Quick start
memory_smart_search { "query": "jwt refresh token rotation", "limit": 10 }
Expected output:
2 results across 2 sessions.
[importance 8] decision · "Rotate refresh tokens on every use" (session 7f3a9c21)
[importance 5] code · "limit.ts counts per-IP" (session b21d004e)
Why
Only surface what the tool returned. Never fabricate an observation, a session id, or an importance score. If nothing comes back, say so.
Workflow
- Call
memory_smart_searchwith the user's text asqueryandlimit: 10. Passprojectwhen the user scopes to a specific repo. - Group results by session. Records carry a provenance channel (
user,agent,tool,import,shared); when results conflict, preferuseroveragentinference, and flagsharedrecords as another teammate's write. - For each observation show its type, title, and narrative.
- Lead with the high-signal observations (importance >= 7).
- If zero results, suggest 2-3 alternative search terms and stop. Do not guess.
Anti-patterns
WRONG: results are empty, so you write "We probably discussed token expiry last week" from assumption.
RIGHT: "No memories matched that query. Try refresh token, session expiry,
or auth rotation."
Checklist
- Every observation shown came from the tool response.
- Results grouped by session, high-importance first.
- Empty results trigger alternative-term suggestions, not invention.
- No session id or score was paraphrased or rounded.
See also
remember: the write side; recall retrieves what it stores.recap,handoff,session-history: session-scoped views of the same data.memory-discipline: when to run this search unprompted.
Troubleshooting
See ../_shared/TROUBLESHOOTING.md if memory_smart_search is not available.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 64 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 430a2527d09c
recall is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohitg00/agentmemory (27,906 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 548 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
impeccable
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states.…
circuit
Operate Circuit, the flow engine that runs coding work as structured, evidence-backed flows (Fix, Build, Explore, Review, Prototype). Use this skill at the START of any substantive coding task in a project where Circuit is installed: fixing a bug, building a feature, refactoring, reviewing a diff or PR, investigating…
latent-potential
First-principles, team-of-experts assessment of a software project that surfaces latent potential; underexploited assets, a sharper north star, missing high-leverage capabilities, better framing and messaging. Produces a prioritized, evidence-grounded report with cheap probes, a reframe candidate, a stop-doing list…
claude-code-audit
Forensic audit of the user's recent Claude Code sessions to surface step-change workflow improvements — not marginal ones. Use when the user asks to "audit my Claude Code sessions", "analyze how I use Claude Code", "find patterns in my usage", "improve my Claude Code workflow", "review my sessions", "find leverage in…
deep-research
Conduct exhaustive, citation-rich research on any topic using all available tools: web search, browser automation, documentation APIs, and codebase exploration. Use when asked to "research X", "find out about Y", "investigate Z", "deep dive into...", "what's the current state of...", "compare options for..."…
literate-guide
Create a narrative guide to a codebase or feature in the style of Knuth's Literate Programming — code and prose interwoven as a single essay, ordered for human understanding rather than compiler needs. Use when the user asks to 'explain this codebase as a story', 'write a literate guide', 'create a narrative…