Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rojim666/SztuCode --skill gh-address-commentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rojim666/SztuCodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rojim666/sztucode/gh-address-comments)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rojim666/sztucode/gh-address-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rojim666/sztucode/gh-address-comments/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rojim666/sztucode/gh-address-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rojim666/sztucode/gh-address-comments.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00312 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00125 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
gh-address-comments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- gh-address-comments — 88% identical, 51 lines differ
What it actually says
PR Comment Handler
Guide to find the open PR for the current branch and address its comments with gh CLI. Run all gh commands with elevated network access.
Prereq: ensure gh is authenticated (for example, run gh auth login once), then run gh auth status with escalated permissions (include workflow/repo scopes) so gh commands succeed. If sandboxing blocks gh auth status, rerun it with sandbox_permissions=require_escalated.
1) Inspect comments needing attention
- Run scripts/fetch_comments.py which will print out all the comments and review threads on the PR
2) Ask the user for clarification
- Number all the review threads and comments and provide a short summary of what would be required to apply a fix for it
- Ask the user which numbered comments should be addressed
3) If user chooses comments
- Apply fixes for the selected comments
Notes:
- If gh hits auth/rate issues mid-run, prompt the user to re-authenticate with
gh auth login, then retry.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -17 lines · -39 tokens per session fef543112ae1
- 2mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A b05994c5195a
gh-address-comments is a skill published in the GitHub repository rojim666/SztuCode (109 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 312 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-this-branch
Run the nohuman review gate (fresh-session adversarial reviewer + tamper guard) over the current branch or a GitHub pull request, with no server, no database, and no onboarding, and relay the pass/fail checklist.
commit
A commit candidate is the exact patch that will enter the commit. A coherent change has one task or issue as its reason for existing.
autofix-pr
Watch a pull request and fix it from a worktree of its own - CI failures, review feedback from trusted authors and merge conflicts are fixed, pushed to the PR branch and answered on the PR under the user's git and gh identity. Usage - /autofix-pr [ | ] [--once] [--every ] [--no-reply] [--yes] [instructions]…
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
github-automation
GitHub workflow automation, PR management, issue tracking, and code review coordination. Integrates with GitHub Actions and repository management. Use when: PR creation, code review, issue management, release automation, workflow setup. Skip when: local-only changes, non-GitHub repositories.
gh-find-prs
Survey open Codewhale PRs and triage each for mergeability and disposition against the real landing branch.