Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rojim666/SztuCode --skill review-agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rojim666/SztuCodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rojim666/sztucode/review-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rojim666/sztucode/review-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rojim666/sztucode/review-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rojim666/sztucode/review-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rojim666/sztucode/review-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00555 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00278 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
review-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to review-agent — 114 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 58 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Agent
Inspect the requested target directly and return every finding that the author would likely fix. Do not modify files, create commits, push branches, post review comments, or delegate the review to another agent.
Review the change
- Read the applicable
AGENTS.mdinstructions. - Inspect the complete diff for the requested target and enough surrounding code to understand each changed path.
- Identify concrete regressions introduced by the change. Continue through the whole diff after finding the first issue.
- Check the relevant tests and call sites to confirm that each finding is real and actionable.
For a base-branch review, compare the changes that would actually merge rather than diffing
directly against the branch tip. Resolve the comparison ref to the branch's upstream when that
upstream exists and is ahead of the local branch; otherwise use the local branch. Run
git merge-base HEAD <comparison-ref>, then inspect git diff <merge-base-sha>. If the local
branch cannot be resolved, try its configured upstream explicitly before reporting that the target
is unavailable.
Flag an issue only when all of these are true:
- It affects correctness, security, performance, or maintainability in a meaningful way.
- It is discrete and actionable.
- It was introduced by the reviewed change.
- The affected scenario or call path can be demonstrated from the code.
- The author would probably fix it if they knew about it.
Do not flag speculative concerns, pre-existing problems, intentional behavior changes, or style nits that do not obscure the code.
Write the result
Present findings first, ordered by severity. Use one entry per issue in this form:
[P1] Imperative finding title — path/to/file.rs:line
Follow the title with one short paragraph explaining the affected scenario and why the behavior is wrong. Keep the cited range as small as possible and make sure it overlaps the reviewed diff.
Use these priorities:
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 58 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A bb46315f6bc4
review-agent is a skill published in the GitHub repository rojim666/SztuCode (59 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 555 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to review-agent, differing in 114 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
spawn-reviewers
Spawn and collect the reviewer fleet at stage20spawnreviewers. Consumes spawn.json.spec (the authoritative spawn spec from derive-spawn-spec / derive-static-spec), resolves GRAPHPROJECT, builds per-agent prompts from the per-agent template + role suffixes (Bug Hunter A/B, Unified Auditor, Domain Critics, Impact…
verify-findings
Dispatch and collect the finding-verifier fleet at stage23verifyfindings (PLN-722). Reads verifymanifest.json (written by stage22bverifyprepare), spawns one falsify-oriented verifier Task per toverify[] entry with mode-specific Task scheduling (GitHub mode dispatches verifiers synchronously; local mode uses parallel…
singleton-dispatch
PLN-725 single-agent dispatch for stage11extractsignals and stage15coveragecritic. After each prepare stage writes its manifest, this skill reads the status field (cachehit / skipped / needsagent) and, only on needsagent, spawns one synchronous singleton Task that writes the by-convention pln725.json output the…
claude-md-improver
Audit and improve existing CLAUDE.md files across a repository. Use for a deliberate, repo-wide quality review—not to record learnings from the current session.
codex-review
Run Codex to review a plan file and return structured feedback with a verdict. Triggers on: debate loop Codex review rounds. Returns VERDICT:APPROVED or VERDICT:NEEDSCHANGES plus CODEXSESSION token.
critic-cache
Check if critic reviews are still valid before re-running Phase 2.5 critics. Compares plan.json + critic-gates.json content hash against stored hash from last critic run. Triggers on: entering Phase 2.5, checking critic cache, before launching critics. Returns CRITICCACHEHIT to skip critics or CRITICCACHEMISS to…