Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add romarayt/raytsystem-public-os --skill raytsystem-security-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/romarayt/raytsystem-public-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/romarayt/raytsystem-public-os/raytsystem-security-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/romarayt/raytsystem-public-os/raytsystem-security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/romarayt/raytsystem-public-os/raytsystem-security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/romarayt/raytsystem-public-os/raytsystem-security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/romarayt/raytsystem-public-os/raytsystem-security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.00465 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00233 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00093 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
raytsystem-security-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
raytsystem Security Review
Inputs and outputs
- Accept one bounded change/run plus threat model and declared permissions.
- Return confirmed or unproven Critical/High findings with repro, violated invariant, and minimal regression test/fix.
Write scope
- Keep review read-only; run only non-mutating diagnostics or isolated synthetic tests.
- Never read secrets without scoped necessity, disclose values, promote, publish, or modify external systems.
Preflight
- Run
uv run raytsystem agent preflight --skill raytsystem-security-review --write --jsonlocally. - Run
agent subagent-checkbefore delegation; hosted review receives only safe excerpts. - Snapshot declared canonical/external state and identify every write/egress boundary.
Workflow
- Trace untrusted input through Fetcher/Extractor/proposal/validation/promotion/query/save paths.
- Test raw/hash/citation closure, generation races, lease fencing, WAL/pointer crash windows, and idempotency.
- Test SQL/FTS injection, resource limits, archive/parser containment, symlink/hardlink/no-follow paths, and secret redaction.
- Verify zero unapproved process/network/outbox/Git/external action.
Validation
- Require a regression test for every confirmed Critical/High issue.
- Re-run scoped and full gates after fixes; never accept skipped required tests.
- Exercise evals
m3-security-review-goldenandm3-security-review-adversarial.
Recovery
- Preserve failed staging and machine-readable reports; retry only classified transient failures.
- On quota/tool loss, list exact reviewed surfaces and remaining adversarial cases.
Stop and approval conditions
- Stop on secret/PII exposure, unsafe external destination, real promotion, destructive action, or missing authority.
- Do not downgrade a confirmed issue because exploitation is inconvenient; fail closed and request the narrow required approval.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 46 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 3b58300384b3
raytsystem-security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository romarayt/raytsystem-public-os (144 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 465 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
openclaw-github-dedupe
Investigate a cluster of GitHub issues and PRs, determine canonical candidates, post duplicate/related status, preserve contributor credit, and execute cleanup actions. Supports autonomous mode for provided-link-only closeout, merge/fix follow-through, changelog, and post-merge issue/PR cleanup.
openclaw-pr-batch-sweep
Select, review, repair, validate, and land batches of up to 20 low-risk OpenClaw contributor pull requests using Vincent's maintainer preferences and bounded sub-agent lanes. Use for "next 20", broad contributor PR sweeps, merge-candidate mining, or continued PR-batch work where drafts, maintainer work, trivial…
contribute
Complete contribution workflow using git-town. Create branch → commit → PR → ship. Preflight at every step.
pre-ship-review
Run a structured quality review before shipping code at any checkpoint such as PRs, releases, or milestones. Use whenever the user says.
generic-react-code-reviewer
Review React/TypeScript code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md workflow compliance. Enforces TypeScript strict mode, GPU-accelerated animations, WCAG AA accessibility, bundle size limits, and surgical simplicity. Use when completing features, before commits, or…
nlpm-audit
Audit SKILL.md, AGENTS.md, prompts, hooks, and plugin manifests for instruction conflicts, quality, broken references, and manifest-to-disk drift.