rome: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/secondary-text-audit/SKILL.md

secondary-text-audit is a skill for Claude Code from rome-os/rome. It costs 206 tokens per session (2,645 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review process for secondary UI text, such as helper text, hints, subtitles, empty-state explanations, and tooltip content.

In plain words
What is it for?
Listing subordinate strings in a screen and deciding whether each should be kept, replaced with shorter wording, or deleted.
Why use it?
It removes copy that repeats what the label already says and rewrites or keeps only text users need before taking action.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths.

This is rome-os/rome's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on rome itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything rome configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to rome-os/rome. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rome-os/rome/main/.claude/skills/secondary-text-audit/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rome-os/rome

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for secondary-text-audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rome-os/rome/secondary-text-audit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rome-os/rome/secondary-text-audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rome-os/rome/secondary-text-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rome-os/rome/secondary-text-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for secondary-text-audit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rome-os/rome/secondary-text-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rome-os/rome/secondary-text-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 206 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,645 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00206 $0.02645
Opus 5 $0.00103 $0.01323
Sonnet 5 $0.00041 $0.00529
Haiku 4.5 $0.00021 $0.00265

Measured 8d ago against content hash dce3b03d1731, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

secondary-text-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/extract-secondary-text.mjs), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/secondary-text-audit/SKILL.md · 218 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 218 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Secondary-Text Audit

Extract every piece of subordinate copy in a surface and put each one on trial. The ruleset's premise is that secondary text defaults to absent: it exists only to carry information the user needs before acting that the label, the control's shape, and the surrounding context do not already give them. Most shipped secondary text describes what something is, which the label already did. That text goes.

The output is a verdict table, not prose commentary. Every row resolves to keep, rewrite, or delete, and every rewrite carries its replacement string.

Design philosophy (read this — it shapes every judgment call)

  1. Delete is the expected majority outcome. This is the inversion that makes the skill useful. An audit that keeps most of what it finds has not applied the ruleset; it has admired the copy. If your table is mostly keep, re-run the fact test on every keep row and mean it.

  2. Uncertainty resolves to delete, with one exception. When a string sits between delete and rewrite, choose delete — the primary label almost always suffices. This is the opposite of the precision-over-recall bias in ux-semantics-audit, and deliberately so: a wrong keep is permanent noise on the screen.

    The exception is a string carrying a cost, a scope, or a cause. Deleting one of those does not cost a line of copy, it costs the reader the fact that made the screen actionable. When the string tells the user what an action breaks, where a setting stops applying, or why a surface is in a state they did not choose, uncertainty resolves to rewrite. Trim it to the fact and keep it.

  3. Judge the rendered pair, never the key name. A verdict needs the label the user actually sees next to the text. A key called *.description may render as a card subtitle, a tooltip body, a dialog description, or nothing at all.

  4. Fact before verdict. Name which kind of fact the text carries before deciding anything. A string carrying none is delete — that is the rule, not a shortcut.

  5. A rewrite must be a real string. "Tighten this" is not a replacement. Write the sentence that ships, in the register docs/ui/VOICE.md fixes. If you cannot write one that passes the rules, the verdict was delete.

Read the full file on GitHub · 218 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago Changed · +14 lines dce3b03d1731
  2. 12d ago First seen · 204 lines · 206 tokens per session scan A 947add2ec678

Subscribe to this mod's changes

secondary-text-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository rome-os/rome (490 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 206 tokens to every session and 2,645 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories