codebase-hygiene

codebase-hygiene is a skill for Claude Code from romiluz13/cc10x. It costs 67 tokens per session (1,330 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review method for finding different functions that do the same job and for spotting code layers that merely pass work through without adding useful behaviour.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect recently changed or high-value code for semantic duplicates and overly thin modules, then propose focused improvements.
Why use it?
These patterns can make a codebase harder to change by duplicating rules or spreading complexity across shallow wrappers.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Part of the cc10x plugin — 22 skills, 14 agents, 10 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to inspect recently changed or high-value code for semantic duplicates and overly thin modules, then propose focused improvements.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/romiluz13/cc10x/codebase-hygiene
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add romiluz13/cc10x --skill codebase-hygiene
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/romiluz13/cc10x

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install cc10x, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 22 skills, 14 agents, 10 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for codebase-hygiene

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/romiluz13/cc10x/codebase-hygiene/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/romiluz13/cc10x/codebase-hygiene)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/romiluz13/cc10x/codebase-hygiene"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/romiluz13/cc10x/codebase-hygiene/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for codebase-hygiene

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/romiluz13/cc10x/codebase-hygiene"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/romiluz13/cc10x/codebase-hygiene.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 67 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,330 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00067 $0.01330
Opus 5.5 $0.00027 $0.00532
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00013 $0.00266
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00133

Measured 1mo ago against content hash ad3bb93ba656, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

codebase-hygiene scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/cc10x/skills/codebase-hygiene/SKILL.md · 99 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Codebase Hygiene (Duplicate Detection + Module Deepening)

Advisory and read-heavy. Diagnoses and proposes; does not refactor. Any actual change goes through BUILD with full gates.

Mode: DUPLICATE DETECTION

Semantic duplicates: functions serving the same purpose but implemented independently under different names. Copy-paste detectors catch syntactic duplicates; this finds "same intent, different implementation."

Method

  1. Scope before you scan — take the user's named target; else git log --oneline for hot spots and weight recently-changed code — deepening pays off in proportion to future change.
  2. Extract catalog — Grep/Glob for exported functions. Record name | file:line | signature.
  3. Categorize by domain (cheap tier) — validation, formatting, path manipulation, HTTP shaping, date handling. Mechanical bucketing to shrink comparison space.
  4. Drop categories with <3 functions — can't hide a meaningful duplication pattern.
  5. Detect duplicates per category (capable tier) — read implementations, decide which share intent. Never use cheap tier for detection — it anchors on names and rubber-stamps "these look different."
  6. Emit findings — group by confidence, highest first. Each finding: what is duplicated, why it matters, the fix, file:line evidence. Route through code-reviewer finding contract.

High-Risk Zones

Zone Why it duplicates
utils/, helpers/, lib/ Catch-all dumping grounds
Validation code "Is this a valid email/id/url" rewritten per feature
Error formatting Every module invents its own Error → string
Path manipulation Join/normalize/relativize reimplemented
String formatting Truncate, slugify, titlecase, pad re-rolled
Date formatting Parse/format/diff scattered
API response shaping Envelope/pagination/error-body copied per endpoint

Consolidation Discipline

Never delete a duplicate until all three hold:

  1. Survivor has tests — pick the implementation with real coverage. If neither has tests, write the test against the chosen survivor first.
  2. All callers updated — Grep to enumerate callers. Missing one is a silent break.
  3. Re-run after consolidation — test suite + build/typecheck pass. Green tests on the survivor license the deletion.

Read the full file on GitHub · 99 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 99 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A ad3bb93ba656

Subscribe to this mod's changes

codebase-hygiene is a skill published in the GitHub repository romiluz13/cc10x (164 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,330 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

issue-analyze

GitHub Issue and PR review thread deep analysis with Codex blind verdict. Use when: analyzing issue root cause, classifying problems, investigation planning, triaging PR review comments for actionability. Not for: fixing bugs (use bug-fix), code exploration (use code-explore). Output: classified analysis + verdict…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 73 tokens

load-pr-review

Load GitHub PR review comments into AI session — analyze, triage, plan. Default: analysis-only (no auto-fix). Use when: reviewing PR feedback, planning fixes, addressing review comments, replying to reviewers. Not for: creating reviews (use codex-review-fast), creating PRs (use create-pr), viewing PR status (use…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 77 tokens

best-practices

Industry best practices conformance audit with mandatory adversarial debate. Produces audit artifact: verdict (OK/WARN/FAIL) + gap roadmap + debate proof. Use when: auditing current implementation against industry standards, checking compliance with best practices, benchmarking implementation quality, verifying a…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 101 tokens

code-explore

Pure Claude code investigation. Use when: tracing execution paths, understanding architecture, diagnosing issues. Not for: dual-perspective review (use code-investigate), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: analysis report with findings.

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 51 tokens

debug

Interactive debugging workflow with hypothesis-driven probe loop. Use when: unknown bugs, script errors, silent failures, troubleshooting. Not for: known bugs (use bug-fix), GitHub issue analysis (use issue-analyze), code understanding (use code-explore). Output: debug report with probe journal + root cause + fix.

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 67 tokens

pre-pr-audit

Pre-PR confidence audit with 5-dimension scoring. Use when: final check before commit/push/PR, evaluating PR readiness, assessing test quality + risk + coverage holistically. Triggers: pre-pr, readiness check, confidence audit, final verification, ready to PR, how confident. Not for: code review (use…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 95 tokens