Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ronmkr/promptbook/crosspostnpx skills add ronmkr/PromptBook --skill crosspostgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ronmkr/PromptBookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/crosspost)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/crosspost"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/crosspost.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00744 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00372 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
crosspost scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to crosspost — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Crosspost
Distribute content across platforms without turning it into the same fake post in four costumes.
When to Activate
- the user wants to publish the same underlying idea across multiple platforms
- a launch, update, release, or essay needs platform-specific versions
- the user says "crosspost", "post this everywhere", or "adapt this for X and LinkedIn"
Core Rules
- Do not publish identical copy across platforms.
- Preserve the author's voice across platforms.
- Adapt for constraints, not stereotypes.
- One post should still be about one thing.
- Do not invent a CTA, question, or moral if the source did not earn one.
Workflow
Step 1: Start with the Primary Version
Pick the strongest source version first:
- the original X post
- the original article
- the launch note
- the thread
- the memo or changelog
Use content-engine first if the source still needs voice shaping.
Step 2: Capture the Voice Fingerprint
Run brand-voice first if the source voice is not already captured in the current session.
Reuse the resulting VOICE PROFILE directly.
Do not build a second ad hoc voice checklist here unless the user explicitly wants a fresh override for this campaign.
Step 3: Adapt by Platform Constraint
X
- keep it compressed
- lead with the sharpest claim or artifact
- use a thread only when a single post would collapse the argument
- avoid hashtags and generic filler
- add only the context needed for people outside the niche
- do not turn it into a fake founder-reflection post
- do not add a closing question just because it is LinkedIn
- do not force a polished "professional tone" if the author is naturally sharper
Threads
- keep it readable and direct
- do not write fake hyper-casual creator copy
- do not paste the LinkedIn version and shorten it
Bluesky
- keep it concise
- preserve the author's cadence
- do not rely on hashtags or feed-gaming language
Posting Order
Default:
- post the strongest native version first
- adapt for the secondary platforms
- stagger timing only if the user wants sequencing help
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 112 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A e9ca03acff07
crosspost is a skill published in the GitHub repository ronmkr/PromptBook (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 744 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to crosspost, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
testing
Testing workflow and quality standards for writing and running tests. Use when: (1) Writing new tests, (2) Adding a new feature that needs tests, (3) Modifying logic that has existing tests, (4) Before claiming a task is complete.
bug-audit
Weekly multi-agent audit for serious bugs (data integrity, silent caps, staleness, timestamp math, trust boundaries). Fans out Sonnet scanners + Opus deep auditors, adversarially verifies every finding, files GitHub issues for confirmed critical/high bugs. Trigger: /bug-audit.
multi-llm-review
Run complete, evidence-backed code reviews through the local stdio gateway across the seven canonical CLI providers: Claude, Codex, Gemini, Grok, Mistral, Devin, and Cursor. Use for quality, security, correctness, or release validation that requires independent reviewers.
retrospective-walk
Walk a human or agent through a diff, worktree, commit range, gateway job, or episode reference as a structured retrospective. Use after implement-review-fix or multi-LLM review cycles, when reviewing prior jobs or uncommitted work, or when durable evidence is needed for what changed, why it changed, who/when…
secure-orchestration
Orchestrate security-sensitive LLM work with the gateway's Claude-managed approval boundary, provider-native legacy controls, evidence-aware auditing, and complete no-limit review handling.
session-workflow
Manage gateway bookkeeping and provider-native conversation continuity across Claude, Codex, Gemini, Grok, Mistral, Devin, and Cursor. Use for multi-turn work, session inspection, and safe resume decisions.