Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ronmkr/promptbook/csharp-testingnpx skills add ronmkr/PromptBook --skill csharp-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ronmkr/PromptBookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/csharp-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/csharp-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/csharp-testing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.01983 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00992 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00397 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
csharp-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to csharp-testing — 26 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 322 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
C# Testing Patterns
Comprehensive testing patterns for .NET applications using xUnit, FluentAssertions, and modern testing practices.
When to Activate
- Writing new tests for C# code
- Reviewing test quality and coverage
- Setting up test infrastructure for .NET projects
- Debugging flaky or slow tests
Test Framework Stack
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| xUnit | Test framework (preferred for .NET) |
| FluentAssertions | Readable assertion syntax |
| NSubstitute or Moq | Mocking dependencies |
| Testcontainers | Real infrastructure in integration tests |
| WebApplicationFactory | ASP.NET Core integration tests |
| Bogus | Realistic test data generation |
Unit Test Structure
Arrange-Act-Assert
public sealed class OrderServiceTests
{
private readonly IOrderRepository _repository = Substitute.For<IOrderRepository>();
private readonly ILogger<OrderService> _logger = Substitute.For<ILogger<OrderService>>();
private readonly OrderService _sut;
public OrderServiceTests()
{
_sut = new OrderService(_repository, _logger);
}
[Fact]
public async Task PlaceOrderAsync_ReturnsSuccess_WhenRequestIsValid()
{
// Arrange
var request = new CreateOrderRequest
{
CustomerId = "cust-123",
Items = [new OrderItem("SKU-001", 2, 29.99m)]
};
// Act
var result = await _sut.PlaceOrderAsync(request, CancellationToken.None);
// Assert
result.IsSuccess.Should().BeTrue();
result.Value.Should().NotBeNull();
result.Value!.CustomerId.Should().Be("cust-123");
}
[Fact]
public async Task PlaceOrderAsync_ReturnsFailure_WhenNoItems()
{
// Arrange
var request = new CreateOrderRequest
{
CustomerId = "cust-123",
Items = []
};
// Act
var result = await _sut.PlaceOrderAsync(request, CancellationToken.None);
// Assert
result.IsSuccess.Should().BeFalse();
result.Error.Should().Contain("at least one item");
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 322 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A df2de8f5c3a1
csharp-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository ronmkr/PromptBook (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,983 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to csharp-testing, differing in 26 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
csharp-testing
C# and .NET testing patterns with xUnit, FluentAssertions, mocking, integration tests, and test organization best practices.
csharp-testing
C# and .NET testing patterns with xUnit, FluentAssertions, mocking, integration tests, and test organization best practices.
rust-testing
Rust testing patterns including unit tests, integration tests, async testing, property-based testing, mocking, and coverage. Follows TDD methodology.
cpp-testing
Use only when writing/updating/fixing C++ tests, configuring GoogleTest/CTest, diagnosing failing or flaky tests, or adding coverage/sanitizers.
golang-testing
Go testing best practices including table-driven tests, test helpers, benchmarking, race detection, coverage analysis, and integration testing patterns. Use when writing or improving Go tests.
testing
Testing workflow and quality standards for writing and running tests. Use when: (1) Writing new tests, (2) Adding a new feature that needs tests, (3) Modifying logic that has existing tests, (4) Before claiming a task is complete.