flutter-dart-code-review

flutter-dart-code-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ronmkr/PromptBook. It costs 56 tokens per session (5,239 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of flutter-dart-code-review, Apache-2.0.

A review checklist for Flutter and Dart applications, covering code structure, state handling, performance, accessibility, security, and language mistakes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review widgets, business-logic boundaries, state management, null safety, generated files, platform-specific code, and project configuration.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers find maintainability problems, unsafe patterns, unnecessary dependencies, and issues that affect app quality.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review widgets, business-logic boundaries, state management, null safety, generated files, platform-specific code, and project configuration.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ronmkr/promptbook/flutter-dart-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ronmkr/PromptBook --skill flutter-dart-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ronmkr/PromptBook

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for flutter-dart-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/flutter-dart-code-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/flutter-dart-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/flutter-dart-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/flutter-dart-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 56 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 5,239 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 98% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00056 $0.05239
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.02619
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.01048
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00524

Measured 4d ago against content hash 48951c35e56c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

flutter-dart-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

98% identical to flutter-dart-code-review — 27 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/technical/flutter-dart-code-review/SKILL.md · 436 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 436 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Flutter/Dart Code Review Best Practices

Comprehensive, library-agnostic checklist for reviewing Flutter/Dart applications. These principles apply regardless of which state management solution, routing library, or DI framework is used.


1. General Project Health

  • Project follows consistent folder structure (feature-first or layer-first)
  • Proper separation of concerns: UI, business logic, data layers
  • No business logic in widgets; widgets are purely presentational
  • pubspec.yaml is clean — no unused dependencies, versions pinned appropriately
  • analysis_options.yaml includes a strict lint set with strict analyzer settings enabled
  • No print() statements in production code — use dart:developer log() or a logging package
  • Generated files (.g.dart, .freezed.dart, .gr.dart) are up-to-date or in .gitignore
  • Platform-specific code isolated behind abstractions

2. Dart Language Pitfalls

  • Implicit dynamic: Missing type annotations leading to dynamic — enable strict-casts, strict-inference, strict-raw-types
  • Null safety misuse: Excessive ! (bang operator) instead of proper null checks or Dart 3 pattern matching (if (value case var v?))
  • Type promotion failures: Using this.field where local variable promotion would work
  • Catching too broadly: catch (e) without on clause; always specify exception types
  • Catching Error: Error subtypes indicate bugs and should not be caught
  • Unused async: Functions marked async that never await — unnecessary overhead
  • late overuse: late used where nullable or constructor initialization would be safer; defers errors to runtime
  • String concatenation in loops: Use StringBuffer instead of + for iterative string building
  • Mutable state in const contexts: Fields in const constructor classes should not be mutable
  • Ignoring Future return values: Use await or explicitly call unawaited() to signal intent
  • var where final works: Prefer final for locals and const for compile-time constants
  • Relative imports: Use package: imports for consistency
  • Mutable collections exposed: Public APIs should return unmodifiable views, not raw List/Map
  • Missing Dart 3 pattern matching: Prefer switch expressions and if-case over verbose is checks and manual casting
  • Throwaway classes for multiple returns: Use Dart 3 records (String, int) instead of single-use DTOs
  • print() in production code: Use dart:developer log() or the project's logging package; print() has no log levels and cannot be filtered

Read the full file on GitHub · 436 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 436 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 48951c35e56c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

flutter-dart-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ronmkr/PromptBook (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 5,239 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 98% identical to flutter-dart-code-review, differing in 27 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

improve-codebase-architecture

Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.

twaldin/flt · 68 tokens

crit

Review code changes, a plan, a live page (running dev server), or a local HTML file with Crit inline comments and structured human feedback. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /crit or directly asks to use Crit; a generic review request does not count.

tomasz-tomczyk/crit · 55 tokens

code-review

Review frontend code for best practices, bugs, and improvements. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code quality, or before committing.

echoVic/blade-code · 29 tokens

review-harness

Use when reviewing implementation work that ran through a /tmp Pi task harness. Checks contract drift, unsafe shortcuts, validation evidence, and status honesty.

spences10/my-pi · 33 tokens

simplify

Code simplification for high-complexity files. Targets deep nesting, copy-paste patterns, and god functions.

epicsagas/epic-harness · 26 tokens

toxic-senior-reviewer

Code review in the voice of a toxic senior developer — dry sarcasm without profanity, no fluff, no empty praise. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a code review, says "how can I improve this", "what do you think of this code", "take a look at this", "rate this solution", "critique this", "do a code review"…

Osipchuk/agent-skills · 206 tokens