Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Rootly-AI-Labs/rootly-claude-plugin --skill retrogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Rootly-AI-Labs/rootly-claude-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rootly-ai-labs/rootly-claude-plugin/retro)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rootly-ai-labs/rootly-claude-plugin/retro"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rootly-ai-labs/rootly-claude-plugin/retro.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00672 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00336 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00134 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
retro scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Retrospective Generator (experimental)
Experimental: this skill uses
context: forkto delegate to theretro-analystagent. In some Claude Code contexts the forked subagent does not inherit the plugin's MCP tools. If the agent reports MCP tools unavailable, use/rootly:brief <incident>for a basic incident summary instead.
You are generating a structured post-incident retrospective. The output should be copy-pasteable markdown.
Workflow
1. Get Incident Data
The incident ID should be provided in $ARGUMENTS. If not provided, ask the user for it.
- Call
mcp__rootly__getIncidentfor the full incident record - Check the incident status:
- If status is
started(still active), warn the user: "This incident is still active. Retrospectives are typically done after resolution. Continue anyway?" Wait for confirmation before proceeding.
- If status is
2. Gather Context
- Call
mcp__rootly__get_alert_by_short_idor alert search tools for the alert timeline - Call
mcp__rootly__find_related_incidentsto check for recurring patterns
3. Generate Retrospective
Output as clean, copy-pasteable markdown:
# Retrospective: [Incident Title]
**Incident ID**: [id]
**Date**: [date]
**Duration**: [start] to [end] ([total duration])
**Severity**: [severity]
## Summary
[1-2 sentence summary of what happened]
## Impact
- **Duration**: [time from detection to resolution]
- **Affected services**: [list]
- **Severity**: [level]
- **User impact**: [description if available]
## Timeline
| Time | Event |
|------|-------|
| [time] | [event] |
| ... | ... |
## Root Cause Analysis
[Analysis based on incident data, alerts, and resolution steps]
## Contributing Factors
- [Factor 1]
- [Factor 2]
## What Went Well
- [Positive aspect 1]
- [Positive aspect 2]
## What Could Be Improved
- [Improvement area 1]
- [Improvement area 2]
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Priority |
|--------|-------|----------|
| [action] | [owner if identifiable] | [high/medium/low] |
## Pattern Note
[If find_related_incidents shows similar past incidents:]
"This is the Nth incident of this type in the last 90 days. Consider systemic fixes."
[If no similar incidents: omit this section]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 87 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A fcd729a4c54a
retro is a skill published in the GitHub repository Rootly-AI-Labs/rootly-claude-plugin (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 672 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
debug-optimize-lcp
Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…
systematic-debugging
Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.
diagnose
Trace from a reproduced symptom to the source code that causes it. Pin the specific file and approximate line, rate confidence in the cause and clarity of the fix independently, and always propose a concrete fix.
repro-admin
Reproduce an EmDash admin UI bug. Attach a container, start the demo dev server, drive the admin with agent-browser using the dev-bypass session, and capture the reproduction as screenshots plus a replayable transcript.
log-error-digest
Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…
byted-util-volcengine-detect-retry
An orchestration workflow for Volcengine Cloud Detect, a service that checks websites or network endpoints from test locations.