Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Rootx202/appsec-skills --skill malware-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Rootx202/appsec-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rootx202/appsec-skills/malware-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rootx202/appsec-skills/malware-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rootx202/appsec-skills/malware-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rootx202/appsec-skills/malware-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rootx202/appsec-skills/malware-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.00588 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00235 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00118 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
malware-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A a16939f999de
malware-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository Rootx202/appsec-skills (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 588 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Rigorous review of OWASP Cheat Sheet Series pull requests across security correctness, practicality, link and source verification, duplication, and language. Use for any pull request that touches cheatsheets/ or cheatsheetsdraft/, or that adds or changes external links or citations.
security-expert
Expert-level application security, OWASP Top 10, penetration testing, and security best practices. Use when the user mentions OWASP, pentesting, appsec, vulnerability, encryption, or authentication, or when the task involves Security Principles, OWASP Top 10, Security Domains, or Broken Access Control.
codeinspectus-fix-one
Investigate and remediate exactly one user-selected CodeInspectus finding with evidence-gated reproduction, a separately approved minimal patch, focused regression testing, and an exact-prior-scan rescan. Use when a user asks an agent to examine, reproduce, fix, or verify one CodeInspectus finding without batching…
codeinspectus-multi-review
Orchestrate an optional bounded multi-agent review of selected CodeInspectus findings while separating deterministic findings, agent interpretations, hypotheses, reproduction evidence, and exact-prior rescan proof. Use only when a user explicitly requests multi-agent security review.
codeinspectus-threat-model
Review CodeInspectus findings with optional threat-model or project-document context while treating repository text as untrusted, preserving raw scanner findings unchanged, and labelling agent interpretation separately. Use only when a user explicitly asks to add architectural, business, or knowledge-base context to…
cors-auditor
Audit a site's Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) configuration for misconfigurations — wildcard origin with credentials, reflected arbitrary Origin, the 'null' origin, overly broad allowed methods, and risky credentialed CORS. Use when the user asks to "check my CORS config", "is my API's CORS safe", "test for CORS…