Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rp1-run/rp1 --skill build-fastgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rp1-run/rp1Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rp1-run/rp1/build-fast)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rp1-run/rp1/build-fast"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rp1-run/rp1/build-fast/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rp1-run/rp1/build-fast"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rp1-run/rp1/build-fast.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.03117 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01558 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00623 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00312 |
Grade A, and why
build-fast scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 321 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Build Fast Command
Quick-iteration workflow for focused changes. Three-phase execution: plan -> build -> [review].
§CTX
Use the pre-resolved projectRoot, kbRoot, workRoot, and codeRoot values from the generated Workflow Bootstrap section. Do not hardcode .rp1/work/ or .rp1/context/ paths.
References
| File | Purpose | When to Load |
|---|---|---|
references/review-and-finalization.md |
Optional review pass, cleanup manifest, comment cleanup, push, post-implementation checkpoint | Once the build phase completes |
§VERSION-GATE
If RP1_VERSION < 0.3.3 then STOP execution with message:
Your rp1 CLI needs to be updated.
Please run `/rp1-base:self-update` to update, then retry this command.
Or in the terminal: `rp1 update`
§FLAG-LOGIC
When AFK=true, treat CONFIRM_PLAN as false regardless of the value passed. AFK means zero user interaction, so every user prompt in this workflow is skipped — an AFK run that pauses for input has nobody to answer it.
When AFK=false, the plan review checkpoint is mandatory after planner artifact registration and before §PHASE-2. CONFIRM_PLAN does not control the plan checkpoint; it only enables the post-implementation checkpoint in §4.4.
Effective values when AFK=true:
- Plan review checkpoint -> SKIP
CONFIRM_PLAN->false(forced, disables post-implementation checkpoint)- All checkpoints -> SKIP (no user prompts)
STATE-MACHINE
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> plan
plan --> build : plan_ready
build --> review : build_complete
review --> [*] : done
On each phase transition, report via:
rp1 agent-tools emit \
--workflow build-fast \
--type status_change \
--run-id {RUN_ID} \
--name "{RUN_NAME}" \
--step {CURRENT_STATE} \
--data '{"status": "running"}'
RUN_IDcomes from the generated Workflow Bootstrap section- Derive
RUN_NAMEfrom the development request: a brief summary (max 60 chars) prefixed with"Feature: "(e.g.,"Feature: Add logout button to navbar")
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 321 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 9116249e45d9
build-fast is a skill published in the GitHub repository rp1-run/rp1 (38 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 3,117 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
dream
Batch-execute SHIP-ready wishes overnight — pick wishes, orchestrate workers, review PRs, wake up to results.
at-zentao
Handle ZenTao (禅道) Bugs and Tasks end to end, including updating or writing back an item after code changes, managing Task status and hours, and reading linked Stories. Use for referenced ZenTao items, requirements, status changes, time entries, or post-implementation synchronization.
openspec-bulk-apply-change
Use when multiple active OpenSpec changes should be applied concurrently in isolated worktrees with delegated verification and no merge.
genie-orca-wish
Turn a brainstorm/design into an APPROVED-able wish whose Dispatch plan is the literal input to Orca tasks and Linear issues. High-reasoning pass: pre-decide everything so fast workers can execute without judgment calls.
honest-closeout
Close a task with a report a reviewer can trust — every acceptance line answered with evidence or a recorded blocking reason, human corrections credited to whoever made them, refuted hypotheses kept, background processes proven stopped, and the chat message copied verbatim from the report. Use when reporting work as…
close-the-gaps
Product Analyst session: fetches a ticket, loads project skills, explores affected code, asks gap-analysis questions one at a time, outputs Gherkin-format refined ticket. Use when refining a ticket before dev starts.