Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rp1-run/rp1 --skill phase-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rp1-run/rp1Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rp1-run/rp1/phase-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rp1-run/rp1/phase-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rp1-run/rp1/phase-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rp1-run/rp1/phase-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rp1-run/rp1/phase-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.01537 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00768 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00307 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
phase-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Phase Planning Workflow
YOU ARE A PURE ORCHESTRATOR. Spawn phase-planner, parse its JSON response, track workflow state, and register the generated artifact. Do not write or edit planning artifacts yourself.
Command Contract: /phase-plan <source> [--afk]
§CTX
Use the pre-resolved projectRoot, kbRoot, and workRoot values from the generated Workflow Bootstrap section. Do not hardcode .rp1/work/ or .rp1/context/ paths.
SOURCE is the user-provided planning source path or identifier. It must resolve to either:
- a PRD under
{workRoot}/prds/*.md - an oversized requirements artifact under
{workRoot}/features/*/requirements.md
UPDATE_CONTEXT is optional revision guidance for refreshing an existing phase plan.
This workflow is single-pass. It does not emit waiting_for_user for source ambiguity. If SOURCE is ambiguous, the planner must return terminal status="error" JSON so the user can rerun /phase-plan with an explicit source path.
STATE-MACHINE
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> analyze
analyze --> publish : plan_ready
publish --> completed : published
analyze --> failed : error
publish --> failed : error
completed --> [*]
failed --> [*]
First emit (entering analyze) includes --name:
rp1 agent-tools emit \
--workflow phase-plan \
--type status_change \
--run-id {RUN_ID} \
--step analyze \
--name "Phase Plan: {source summary}" \
--data '{"status": "running"}'
Subsequent transitions omit --name:
rp1 agent-tools emit \
--workflow phase-plan \
--type status_change \
--run-id {RUN_ID} \
--step {STATE} \
--data '{"status": "running"}'
Terminal states:
rp1 agent-tools emit \
--workflow phase-plan \
--type status_change \
--run-id {RUN_ID} \
--step {STATE} \
--data '{"status": "completed"}'
On failure:
rp1 agent-tools emit \
--workflow phase-plan \
--type status_change \
--run-id {RUN_ID} \
--step failed \
--data '{"status": "failed"}'
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 221 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 260ec4b4cbd9
phase-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository rp1-run/rp1 (38 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,537 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
dream
Batch-execute SHIP-ready wishes overnight — pick wishes, orchestrate workers, review PRs, wake up to results.
at-zentao
Handle ZenTao (禅道) Bugs and Tasks end to end, including updating or writing back an item after code changes, managing Task status and hours, and reading linked Stories. Use for referenced ZenTao items, requirements, status changes, time entries, or post-implementation synchronization.
openspec-bulk-apply-change
Use when multiple active OpenSpec changes should be applied concurrently in isolated worktrees with delegated verification and no merge.
genie-orca-wish
Turn a brainstorm/design into an APPROVED-able wish whose Dispatch plan is the literal input to Orca tasks and Linear issues. High-reasoning pass: pre-decide everything so fast workers can execute without judgment calls.
honest-closeout
Close a task with a report a reviewer can trust — every acceptance line answered with evidence or a recorded blocking reason, human corrections credited to whoever made them, refuted hypotheses kept, background processes proven stopped, and the chat message copied verbatim from the report. Use when reporting work as…
close-the-gaps
Product Analyst session: fetches a ticket, loads project skills, explores affected code, asks gap-analysis questions one at a time, outputs Gherkin-format refined ticket. Use when refining a ticket before dev starts.