Comet is a resumable workflow and skill platform for coding tasks, covering requirements work as well as skill creation, evaluation, and release. It supports separate Native and Classic workflows and can coordinate implementation and verification across isolated Git worktrees. The catalogue contains skills and instructions that implement Comet-related workflows.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rpamis/comet --skill comet-github-issue-fixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rpamis/cometWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-github-issue-fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-github-issue-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-github-issue-fix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-github-issue-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-github-issue-fix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.00455 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00182 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
comet-github-issue-fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Comet GitHub Issue 修复
先读取 ../comet-github/references/maintainer-contract.md。将 Issue 或 review 作为输入契约，不要把它当作修改 GitHub 或发布代码的授权。
确认工作边界
- 阅读实时 Issue/PR，验证报告的问题确实存在。不要实施未经确认的 review bot 推测。
- 确认目标分支、仓库状态、已有脏文件和关联 worktree。
- 保护用户当前 checkout。目标分支或工作区较脏时，使用隔离的 worktree/branch。
- 编辑前定义最小行为、文件、测试、生成资产、文档和非目标范围。
通过 Comet 所属流程实施
- Native 工作使用 Native workflow，Classic 工作使用 Classic workflow。
- 实施过程中扩大范围时，先回到所属 Build/范围确认步骤，再增加文件或行为。
- 通过支持的命令管理 Runtime 状态和生成资产，不手工编辑机器状态或把生成 bundle 当作源文件。
- 使用满足已确认 Issue 的最小生产改动；缺陷可复现时增加聚焦回归测试。
验证与交接
先运行最小相关测试。变更跨越对应边界时，再增加 build、生成资产、lint 或全量检查。分别报告本地结果、无关失败和远端 CI。
明确判断最终行为是否用户可见、是否需要 Changelog。开发新功能过程中发现的内部问题，不写成 Changelog 条目。
除非用户要求，不提交、推送、评论或创建 PR。获得授权后，将准确文件范围交给 comet-safe-delivery。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A a1263a4d93fe
comet-github-issue-fix is a skill published in the GitHub repository rpamis/comet (3,204 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 455 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
git-investigate
Git history investigation. Use when: tracking code changes, finding where bugs were introduced, root cause analysis. Not for: code exploration (use code-explore), issue analysis (use issue-analyze). Output: history trace + root cause report.
check
Reviews diffs, PRs, release readiness, and publishing follow-through. Use when asked to review, triage issues or PRs, or ship. Not for debugging root causes or prose.
reproduce-and-fix-issues
Reproduce triaged Slack bugs through a configured app-control adapter, verify existing fixes, and open a bounded draft pull request only after before-and-after proof. Use only from the configured Benny repro automation.
push-ci
Push to remote and monitor CI. Validates branch safety, executes git push WITH explicit user approval, then monitors CI run status via gh CLI. Use when: user says 'push', 'push and watch CI', 'ship it', 'push-ci'. Not for: committing (use /smart-commit), creating PRs (use /create-pr), merging (use /merge-prep).
gh-stack
Native stacked pull requests through the github/gh-stack extension. Detects the extension, installs it only after the user approves, resolves the branch chain, and executes gh stack link / gh stack push / gh stack submit --auto under a per-use AskUserQuestion gate. Use when: opening or refreshing a native stack of…
smart-rebase
Smart partial rebase for squash-merge repositories. Auto-detect which commits to keep/drop when base branch was squash-merged into target. Use when: user says 'rebase', 'partial rebase', 'base already merged', 'smart rebase', or /smart-rebase. Not for: simple git rebase (the developer runs it — no skill executes…