escalation-and-renegotiation

escalation-and-renegotiation is a skill for Claude Code from rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer. It costs 123 tokens per session (2,015 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A delivery-planning guide that orders work by risk and dependencies rather than convenience. It favors testing unknowns early, delivering independent slices, and stating what facts would change the plan.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after feasibility and estimation when work needs sequencing, especially across teams or toward a release window. It also supports replanning after delays or changed requirements.
Why use it?
It helps reveal an unworkable plan while there is still time to adjust it. It also makes cross-team dependencies, lead times, and replanning conditions explicit.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the fde-core plugin — 30 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it after feasibility and estimation when work needs sequencing, especially across teams or toward a release window. It also supports replanning after delays or changed requirements.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/escalation-and-renegotiation
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer --skill escalation-and-renegotiation
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install fde-core, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 30 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for escalation-and-renegotiation

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/escalation-and-renegotiation/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/escalation-and-renegotiation)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/escalation-and-renegotiation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/escalation-and-renegotiation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for escalation-and-renegotiation

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/escalation-and-renegotiation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/escalation-and-renegotiation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 123 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,015 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00123 $0.02015
Opus 5 $0.00062 $0.01007
Sonnet 5 $0.00025 $0.00403
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00201

Measured 11d ago against content hash ec4d7922aa0c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

escalation-and-renegotiation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

fde-core/skills/escalation-and-renegotiation/SKILL.md · 159 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 159 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Escalation and renegotiation

Saying the difficult thing, early, in a way that gets acted on.

Why this exists

This is the hardest thing an FDE does, and the most consequential. Engagements are rarely judged on code quality. They're judged on whether the people paying for them felt informed and in control — and that is decided almost entirely by how you handle the moment when things stop going to plan.

Two failure modes, both common:

Waiting until certain. The instinct is to raise a problem only once you fully understand it and have a solution. By then the options that existed at first suspicion — re-scoping, adding help, resetting expectations while there's still time — have expired. The delivery lead loses those options without ever knowing they had them, and that is what damages trust, far more than the problem itself.

Escalating without evidence or a recommendation. Arriving with a problem and no analysis reads as complaining, and it transfers work to someone with less context than you.

The FDE's position makes both harder. You have no track record, you're often perceived as expensive, and you may be raising a problem the permanent team has already learned to live with.

When this applies

  • The plan is no longer achievable
  • A dependency has passed its expected date
  • A requirement turns out to be wrong or unbuildable as specified
  • You're being asked to commit to something you don't believe is deliverable
  • A quality or safety concern is being deprioritized
  • As soon as you suspect — not when you're certain

When it doesn't

  • Normal in-flight variance you can absorb without affecting anything visible
  • A technical decision within your remit — make it, record it in an ADR
  • You haven't yet done the work to establish what's true. Spend an hour on that first; arriving with evidence is the whole difference.
  • A routine status update with no decision needed — that's stakeholder-brief

Prerequisites

  • .fde/00-engagement.md — who can actually decide
  • The artifact that holds the evidence (04-feasibility.md, 05b-estimate.md, 00b-access.md, …)
  • ../_shared/comms-register.md before writing to anyone above tech lead

Read the full file on GitHub · 159 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 159 lines · 123 tokens per session scan A ec4d7922aa0c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

escalation-and-renegotiation is a skill published in the GitHub repository rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer (6 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 123 tokens to every session and 2,015 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.