Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer --skill feasibility-probegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/feasibility-probe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/feasibility-probe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/feasibility-probe/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/feasibility-probe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/feasibility-probe.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00146 | $0.03275 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00073 | $0.01638 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00655 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00328 |
Grade A, and why
feasibility-probe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 249 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Feasibility probe
The highest-value thing an FDE does.
Why this exists
Everyone in the organization can write a spec. Almost nobody can tell you, in hours rather than weeks, what that spec means against the real code. That gap is where estimation failures come from — not from bad arithmetic, but from sizing work nobody had looked at.
The characteristic failure isn't the requirement that looks hard and is. It's the one that looks trivial: a field added to a response, which turns out to flow through a shared DTO used by four teams, a published contract with external consumers, and a batch job that parses the payload positionally. Nobody estimated that because nobody looked.
This skill looks. It is deliberately bounded — hours, not weeks — because its value is being fast enough to change the plan before the plan hardens.
When this applies
- A spec exists and someone is about to size it
- "How hard would it be to…?"
- A plan or a date feels optimistic and you can't yet say why
- Assessment engagements, where this plus a brief is the whole deliverable
- Before committing to anything in front of a stakeholder
When it doesn't
- Requirements aren't written yet — run
requirements-to-specfirst - You already know the system deeply and the change is genuinely local
- You need the deep behavior of one flow — that's
trace-the-flow, which this may tell you to run
Prerequisites
.fde/03-requirements.md— you're probing these requirements.fde/02-system-map.md— you need to know where things are before asking whether they exist
Missing the system map, you'll re-derive it inline, badly and without citations. Run repo-recon first. If the engagement genuinely doesn't warrant it, say so in the Confidence line.
Procedure
Work requirement by requirement. Steps 1–5 per requirement, then 6–8 across the set.
1. Does this already exist?
Search before assuming absence. In a large enterprise system the capability frequently exists — partially, under a different name, disabled behind a flag, or built for a neighbouring use case two years ago.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 249 lines · 146 tokens per session scan A 75749cd82941
feasibility-probe is a skill published in the GitHub repository rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer (6 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 146 tokens to every session and 3,275 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
consultancy-practices
Apply effective software quality consultancy practices. Use when consulting, advising clients, or establishing consultancy workflows.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
taiyi-ui-design
A design-planning guide for describing how an application's user interface should look and behave. It produces a UI-DESIGN.md document covering layouts, components, interactions, accessibility, and error states.
ln-62-repository-publisher
Commits, pushes, and remotely verifies authorized repository changes. Not for releases, package publication, or announcements.
remove
Remove a deployed framework or addon from the current workspace.
maggy
Maggy is a local AI engineering command center. AI-prioritized inbox across issue trackers (GitHub Issues/Asana), one-click TDD execute with iCPG context enrichment, daily competitor intelligence briefing.