feasibility-probe

feasibility-probe is a skill for Claude Code from rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer. It costs 146 tokens per session (3,275 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A short investigation that compares a written specification with the existing codebase to find what already exists, what must change, and what is missing.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after requirements are written and before estimating work, setting a date, or making a commitment to a stakeholder.
Why use it?
It prevents inaccurate estimates and missed dependencies, especially when a small-looking change affects shared code or external users.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the fde-core plugin — 30 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it after requirements are written and before estimating work, setting a date, or making a commitment to a stakeholder.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/feasibility-probe
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer --skill feasibility-probe
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install fde-core, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 30 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for feasibility-probe

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/feasibility-probe/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/feasibility-probe)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/feasibility-probe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/feasibility-probe/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for feasibility-probe

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/feasibility-probe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/feasibility-probe.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 146 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,275 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00146 $0.03275
Opus 5 $0.00073 $0.01638
Sonnet 5 $0.00029 $0.00655
Haiku 4.5 $0.00015 $0.00328

Measured 9d ago against content hash 75749cd82941, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

feasibility-probe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

fde-core/skills/feasibility-probe/SKILL.md · 249 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 249 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Feasibility probe

The highest-value thing an FDE does.

Why this exists

Everyone in the organization can write a spec. Almost nobody can tell you, in hours rather than weeks, what that spec means against the real code. That gap is where estimation failures come from — not from bad arithmetic, but from sizing work nobody had looked at.

The characteristic failure isn't the requirement that looks hard and is. It's the one that looks trivial: a field added to a response, which turns out to flow through a shared DTO used by four teams, a published contract with external consumers, and a batch job that parses the payload positionally. Nobody estimated that because nobody looked.

This skill looks. It is deliberately bounded — hours, not weeks — because its value is being fast enough to change the plan before the plan hardens.

When this applies

  • A spec exists and someone is about to size it
  • "How hard would it be to…?"
  • A plan or a date feels optimistic and you can't yet say why
  • Assessment engagements, where this plus a brief is the whole deliverable
  • Before committing to anything in front of a stakeholder

When it doesn't

  • Requirements aren't written yet — run requirements-to-spec first
  • You already know the system deeply and the change is genuinely local
  • You need the deep behavior of one flow — that's trace-the-flow, which this may tell you to run

Prerequisites

  • .fde/03-requirements.md — you're probing these requirements
  • .fde/02-system-map.md — you need to know where things are before asking whether they exist

Missing the system map, you'll re-derive it inline, badly and without citations. Run repo-recon first. If the engagement genuinely doesn't warrant it, say so in the Confidence line.

Procedure

Work requirement by requirement. Steps 1–5 per requirement, then 6–8 across the set.

1. Does this already exist?

Search before assuming absence. In a large enterprise system the capability frequently exists — partially, under a different name, disabled behind a flag, or built for a neighbouring use case two years ago.

Read the full file on GitHub · 249 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 249 lines · 146 tokens per session scan A 75749cd82941

Subscribe to this mod's changes

feasibility-probe is a skill published in the GitHub repository rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer (6 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 146 tokens to every session and 3,275 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.