observability-gap

observability-gap is a skill for Claude Code from rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer. It costs 99 tokens per session (2,109 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A method for finding gaps in a system's ability to show and report failures. Logs record events, metrics measure behavior, traces follow requests, and alerts notify people when something needs attention.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after a hard-to-diagnose incident or before shipping a change to identify missing logs, measurements, tracing, dashboards, or alerts.
Why use it?
It helps explain why an incident was difficult to diagnose and prevents future failures from happening silently.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the fde-operate plugin — 3 skills shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/observability-gap
Any agent
npx skills add rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer --skill observability-gap
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install fde-operate, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 3 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for observability-gap

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/observability-gap.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/observability-gap)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/observability-gap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer/observability-gap.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 99 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,109 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00099 $0.02109
Opus 5 $0.00049 $0.01055
Sonnet 5 $0.00020 $0.00422
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00211

Measured 6d ago against content hash 27a92e5953db, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

observability-gap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

fde-operate/skills/observability-gap/SKILL.md · 175 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 175 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Observability gap

Making the next incident cheaper than this one.

Why this exists

After an incident everyone discusses the cause. Almost nobody discusses why it took forty minutes to find — and that second question is usually the more valuable one, because the cause was specific to this incident while the diagnosis difficulty will recur across every future one.

If the answer was hard to find, that is a fixable defect. A missing log line, an absent metric, a dashboard that shows the symptom but not the cause, an alert that fires on the wrong thing. Each one costs time in every incident that touches that area, forever, and each is usually a small change.

This is the compounding skill in the portfolio. It's also the one most easily deferred, because the incident is over and the pressure is gone. That's precisely why it needs to be a deliberate step rather than an intention.

The other half is prospective: before shipping, asking whether this change's failure would be silent. A failure nobody detects is far more dangerous than one that pages someone at 3am.

When this applies

  • After any incident where diagnosis was hard
  • Before shipping anything whose failure would be silent
  • A change has no way to be detected going wrong
  • Diagnosis required guessing rather than looking
  • nfr-baseline flagged a silent-failure risk

When it doesn't

  • During an active incident — fix it first, come back after
  • The system is already well instrumented in the relevant area
  • Adding telemetry nobody will look at, which is cost without benefit

Prerequisites

  • Locate the workspace: FDE_WORKSPACE, else the charter Location, else .fde/, else ../<repo>-fde/
  • .fde/incidents/*.md — specifically the "what made this hard" section
  • .fde/03b-nfrs.md — the silent-failure analysis
  • .fde/08-release-readiness.md — the observability dimension

Procedure

1. Start from a real diagnosis, not from a checklist

The best input is a specific incident and the specific moments where you were stuck. incident-triage records these under "what made this hard" for exactly this reason.

Read the full file on GitHub · 175 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 175 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 27a92e5953db

Subscribe to this mod's changes

observability-gap is a skill published in the GitHub repository rpraharaj/forward-deployed-engineer (6 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 2,109 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

fishbone-diagram

Use when a problem may have multiple operational, human, process, system, or environmental causes. Use when applying the Fishbone Diagram consulting method and when a user asks for Fishbone Diagram, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.

fzfclee/consulting-skills · 53 tokens

five-whys-root-cause

Use when a problem keeps recurring, the first explanation is too shallow, or the action plan risks treating symptoms. Use when applying the Five Whys Root Cause consulting method and when a user asks for Five Whys Root Cause, method execution, structured diagnosis, or action planning.

fzfclee/consulting-skills · 62 tokens

debug-optimize-lcp

Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…

ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp · 99 tokens

systematic-debugging

Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.

open-metadata/OpenMetadata · 37 tokens

diagnose

Trace from a reproduced symptom to the source code that causes it. Pin the specific file and approximate line, rate confidence in the cause and clarity of the fix independently, and always propose a concrete fix.

emdash-cms/emdash · 43 tokens

azsdk-common-pipeline-analysis

Analyze Azure SDK CI/CD pipeline failures into a structured diagnosis, and define the required output format. Load this skill before calling azsdkanalyzepipeline, which returns raw failure data that this skill interprets and formats. USE FOR: "pipeline failed", "build failure", "CI check failing", "tests failing in…

Azure/azure-sdk-for-net · 192 tokens