wiki-lint

wiki-lint is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from rretsiem/opencode-hive. It costs 55 tokens per session (423 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A skill that checks a project wiki for required structure, metadata, stale pages, broken links, and missing documentation coverage.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to lint wiki pages, report findings by severity, mark stale content, and identify missing or broken cross-references.
Why use it?
It finds documentation problems that can make a wiki incomplete, outdated, or difficult to navigate.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions OpenCode.

Good fit Use it to lint wiki pages, report findings by severity, mark stale content, and identify missing or broken cross-references.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rretsiem/opencode-hive/wiki-lint
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rretsiem/opencode-hive --skill wiki-lint
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rretsiem/opencode-hive

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for wiki-lint

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rretsiem/opencode-hive/wiki-lint/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rretsiem/opencode-hive/wiki-lint)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rretsiem/opencode-hive/wiki-lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rretsiem/opencode-hive/wiki-lint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for wiki-lint

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rretsiem/opencode-hive/wiki-lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rretsiem/opencode-hive/wiki-lint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 55 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 423 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00055 $0.00423
Opus 5.5 $0.00022 $0.00169
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00085
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00042

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 49420d675f9c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

wiki-lint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

global/skills/wiki-lint/SKILL.md · 40 lines

What it actually says

Wiki Lint

When to Use

  • "Check the wiki health"
  • "Lint the wiki"
  • "Are there stale wiki pages?"
  • After major refactors
  • Monthly maintenance

Workflow

  1. Invoke the wiki-curator agent with the lint operation.
  2. The curator runs the conformance checklist from WIKI_SCHEMA.md:
    • Parseable YAML frontmatter on every non-reserved .md file
    • Non-empty type: on every concept
    • index.md and log.md follow their structure when present
    • sources[].id is unique per concept
    • Markdown footnote labels match a sources[].id
    • stale_after is an ISO date when present
    • Cross-references resolve or are flagged as future-writes
  3. The curator marks stale pages (⚠️ STALE — past stale_after (<date>) or ⚠️ STALE — last verified <date>) at the top of the body.
  4. Report findings categorized by severity (critical / warning / note).
  5. Ask the user which issues to fix automatically vs flag for manual review.

Notes

  • OKF v0.2 is permissive: missing optional fields, unknown types, unknown extra frontmatter keys, and broken cross-links are warnings, not failures.
  • A missing type: field is the only conformance failure that prevents a bundle from being consumable.
  • Trust tiers are advisory. A wiki without verified: entries is still consumable; consumers just classify such pages as "unverified".
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 49420d675f9c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

wiki-lint is a skill published in the GitHub repository rretsiem/opencode-hive (42 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 423 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.